18 messages in net.nether.puck.cisco-nsp[c-nsp] 12.2(25)S on NPEG1
FromSent OnAttachments
Mark Pace BalzanJan 23, 2005 8:20 am 
Jared MauchJan 23, 2005 9:13 am 
nishal goburdhanJan 25, 2005 7:39 am 
Marcus StoegbauerJan 25, 2005 9:23 am 
Santiago Felipe PerezJan 28, 2005 5:41 am 
David J. HughesJan 31, 2005 6:08 pm 
james edwardsJan 31, 2005 6:26 pm 
Clayton KossmeyerJan 31, 2005 7:20 pm 
David J. HughesJan 31, 2005 7:25 pm 
james edwardsJan 31, 2005 7:31 pm 
Clayton KossmeyerJan 31, 2005 7:33 pm 
nishal goburdhanFeb 2, 2005 11:48 am 
james edwardsFeb 3, 2005 5:35 pm 
Denis V. SchapovJul 4, 2005 1:00 am 
nishal goburdhanJul 14, 2005 6:42 am 
nishal goburdhanAug 12, 2005 6:21 pm 
Andris ZarinsAug 14, 2005 9:48 am 
nishal goburdhanAug 14, 2005 4:48 pm 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:[c-nsp] 12.2(25)S on NPEG1Actions...
From:Clayton Kossmeyer (ckos@cisco.com)
Date:Jan 31, 2005 7:33:28 pm
List:net.nether.puck.cisco-nsp

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1

Hi David -

I'll be sure to relay the date as soon as I have it.

Clay

On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 10:25:19AM +1000, David J. Hughes wrote:

Hi,

A "fixed" 12.2(18)S would be fine for me. I appreciate you don't have a schedule at the moment but is there any way you can get us a firm date on that release? We need to make decisions on where to go as a result of these PSIRT related issues.

David ...

On 01/02/2005, at 10:20 AM, Clayton Kossmeyer wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1

Hi Folks -

Not sure what release you were running on, nor where you'd like to go, but we do have a 12.2(18)Sx rebuild scheduled that will address all the recent PSIRT advisories and may not suffer from some of the problems you've seen on 25S. No date yet on when it will be available.

Regards,

Clay

On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 04:26:58PM -0700, james edwards wrote:

I too am on hold on upgrading several 7206 NEP-300 and 400's to 12.2(25)Sx, till I have some word from cisco. I would like to go the S2, for the RPF bug fix.

James H. Edwards Routing and Security Administrator At the Santa Fe Office: Internet at Cyber Mesa jamesh at cybermesa.com noc at cybermesa.com http://www.cybermesa.com/ContactCM (505) 795-7101

----- Original Message ----- From: "David J. Hughes" <bambi at hughes.com.au> To: "'cisco-nsp'" <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net> Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 4:08 PM Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 12.2(25)S on NPEG1

Has there been any further info on this? I've been planning on taking our G1s to 12.2(25)S but this has thrown a spanner in the works. Has there been any word from TAC on this to anyone?

David ...

On 28/01/2005, at 8:41 PM, Santiago Felipe Perez wrote:

Hi,is there any bug explaining this behaviour or any answer from TAC to solve this problem?, because Cisco suggest to go to this release 12.2(25)S2 to solve the problem "Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco IOS Misformed BGPPacketCauses Reload",when the IOS installed is any release of 12.2S.

Any suggest?

-----Mensaje original----- De: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] En nombre de Marcus Stoegbauer Enviado el: martes, 25 de enero de 2005 15:24 Para: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net Asunto: Re: [c-nsp] 12.2(25)S on NPEG1

On Tuesday 25 January 2005 13:39, nishal goburdhan wrote:

we've upgraded a few G1s to 25Sx and noticed that periodically, the router disables 'ip route-cache' across all interfaces.

'sh ip int' reveals: IP fast switching is enabled IP Flow switching is disabled IP CEF switching is disabled

Cisco 7206VXR (NPE-G1) processor (revision A) with 983040K/65536K bytes of memory. System image file is "disk2:c7200-k91p-mz.122-25.S2.bin"

...same has also occured on 12.2(25)S.

has anyone else noticed this?

Yep, that happened here on nearly all of our routers, with NPE-G1 and also with NPE-400. We only did minor changes to the configuration (removing a subinterface, removing an area from OSPF and so on), and suddenly all interfaces had "no ip route-cache" and "no ip route-cache cef" set. Interesting enough, it doesn't happen all the time: On two routers with exactly the same configuration, hardware and software versions, we changed the same things in the config, router1 had "no ip route-cache" set on the interfaces, router2 not.

The problem with "clear access-list counter" happened here, too. I'm currently waiting for Cisco to see that it really is a bug ("Please use clear access-list instead of clear ip access-list" and "Please update to the latest release" isn't very good advice when we're already running 12.2(25)S2 and I only left out the "clear access-list" lines in the bug report to simplify it ...).

Marcus

_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (SunOS)

iD8DBQFB/stCEHa/Ybuq8nARAh9VAJ91paUlT6g9zbGtL9JG34NnPwhMcgCdGSIb FQfBpibwCqw238rXSh1KB9E= =MbsF -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (SunOS)

iD8DBQFB/s5aEHa/Ybuq8nARAr4LAJ9SrPCcG+1hsb3S+dfDpm+Nq9fPzACeIZ6m S3RyZPfKTjPNYu5rtkJvv7Q= =7Rxc -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----