atom feed21 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.ebsoaisLegallyBinding ;was Re: [ebsoa] Re...
FromSent OnAttachments
Duane NickullApr 23, 2004 3:07 pm.pdf
David RR WebberApr 23, 2004 6:21 pm 
Anders W. TellApr 24, 2004 1:22 am 
Duane NickullApr 24, 2004 5:09 am 
Duane NickullApr 24, 2004 5:20 am 
Duane NickullApr 24, 2004 5:28 am 
David RR WebberApr 24, 2004 8:11 am 
Anders W. TellApr 24, 2004 9:48 am.pdf
Anders W. TellApr 24, 2004 9:49 am 
David RR WebberApr 24, 2004 12:33 pm 
Monica J. MartinMay 4, 2004 12:18 pm.pdf
Duane NickullMay 4, 2004 12:43 pm 
Duane NickullMay 4, 2004 12:45 pm 
Duane NickullMay 4, 2004 3:28 pm.pdf
Anders W. TellMay 8, 2004 3:49 am 
David RR WebberMay 8, 2004 11:15 am 
Chiusano JosephMay 9, 2004 11:00 am 
Monica J. MartinMay 9, 2004 11:35 am 
David RR WebberMay 9, 2004 2:15 pm 
Duane NickullMay 10, 2004 10:05 am 
David RR WebberMay 10, 2004 10:10 am 
Subject:isLegallyBinding ;was Re: [ebsoa] Re: [ebxml-bp] eBusiness MetamodelEARLY DRAFT 0.03
From:Anders W. Tell (ande@toolsmiths.se)
Date:Apr 24, 2004 9:48:10 am
List:org.oasis-open.lists.ebsoa
Attachments:
pdf00001.pdf - 63k

Duane Nickull wrote:

The two also intersect and reveal areas that need further thinking. For instance, the attribute "isLegalyBinding" is, IMO, irresponsible to place into a BP artifact since laws differ from country to country. It would be impossible to require this declaration until all contexts are known. The BP must reflect this by making this attribute [0..1] IMO.

You are not alone here. The latest ideas in BP team revolves around removing isLegallyBinding and propose that a Flag is added to StandardBusinessDocument Header that signifies TEST or PRODUCTION or similar.

Which is by the way is supported by EAN.UCC, see attachment.

/anders