atom feed15 messages in com.selenic.mercurialRepository collection practices
FromSent OnAttachments
Mark WhiteJun 26, 2006 11:31 am 
Eric HopperJun 26, 2006 11:43 am 
Bryan O'SullivanJun 26, 2006 12:32 pm 
Josef "Jeff" SipekJun 26, 2006 12:32 pm 
Bryan O'SullivanJun 26, 2006 12:41 pm 
Eric HopperJun 26, 2006 1:38 pm 
Sanjoy MahajanJun 26, 2006 2:13 pm 
Bryan O'SullivanJun 26, 2006 2:36 pm 
Mark WhiteJun 26, 2006 5:58 pm 
Bryan O'SullivanJun 26, 2006 6:33 pm 
Josef "Jeff" SipekJun 26, 2006 8:45 pm 
Mark WhiteJun 27, 2006 5:00 am 
TK SohJun 27, 2006 10:47 am 
Thomas Arendsen HeinJun 30, 2006 4:31 am 
Thomas Arendsen HeinJun 30, 2006 4:41 am 
Subject:Repository collection practices
From:Mark White (ma@celos.net)
Date:Jun 26, 2006 11:31:09 am
List:com.selenic.mercurial

Out of interest: what kind of working practices do people have for organising their collections of Hg repositories (which, under eg Subversion, might live in a single tree?)

And am I right in thinking that the revlog approach to hashing changes means Mercurial is fundamentally not geared to work with subtrees? (In other words: is it feasible that "hg clone" could work on part of the tree one day, without breaking the ability to push/pull between clone and parent?)

Mark <><