

![]() | Start a set with this search |
![]() | Include this search in one of my sets |
![]() | Exclude this search from one of my sets |
![]() | Permalink to these results Paste this link in email or IM: |
| Atom feed for tracking future search results Paste this URL into your reader: |
11 messages in net.nether.puck.cisco-nsp[c-nsp] Catalyst SX GBIC's and SMF| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Robert Walton | Jan 7, 2005 3:11 am | |
| Mikael Abrahamsson | Jan 7, 2005 3:36 am | |
| Justin M. Streiner | Jan 7, 2005 12:28 pm | |
| Lindahl, Carl | Jan 7, 2005 12:36 pm | |
| Tim Winders | Jan 7, 2005 1:54 pm | |
| Tristan Gulyas | Jan 10, 2005 5:15 am | |
| Church, Chuck | Jan 10, 2005 8:39 am | |
| Niels Bakker | Jan 10, 2005 8:58 am | |
| Bill Wichers | Jan 10, 2005 1:16 pm | |
| Mikael Abrahamsson | Jan 10, 2005 3:51 pm | |
| Bill Wichers | Jan 10, 2005 4:59 pm |

![]() | Permalink for this message Paste this link in email or IM: |
![]() | Permalink for this thread Paste this link in email or IM: |
| Atom feed for this thread Paste this URL into your reader: |
| Subject: | [c-nsp] Catalyst SX GBIC's and SMF | Actions... |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Church, Chuck (cchu...@netcogov.com) | |
| Date: | Jan 10, 2005 8:39:02 am | |
| List: | net.nether.puck.cisco-nsp | |
For what it's worth, here is info on distances for both GBICs and SFPs: SFP - http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/modules/ps5000/products_data_shee t09186a008014cb62.html GBIC - http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/modules/ps872/products_data_sheet 09186a008014cb5e.html
Table One in both cases. LX will provide much longer distance on MM if you're stuck using 62.5 micron cable, maybe that's what they were referring to.
Chuck Church Lead Design Engineer CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE Netco Government Services - Design & Implementation Team 1210 N. Parker Rd. Greenville, SC 29609 Home office: 864-335-9473 Cell: 703-819-3495 cchu...@netcogov.com PGP key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x4371A48D
-----Original Message----- From: cisc...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisc...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Tristan Gulyas Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 5:16 AM To: cisc...@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Catalyst SX GBIC's and SMF
All,
I have seen an installation where mode conditioning cables are used to go between LX SFP modules with MM fibre. I have no idea about the reverse (SX GBICs with SM fibre) although I don't see why this wouldn't be possible.
I have been told that running 1000baseLX with MM fibre + mode conditioning patch cables gives you "slightly better" range than using native SX, but
there's no solid evidence for this, so I'd stick to the 550 metre spec as per 1000baseSX to be safe.
With respect to the original problem, it depends on how the fibre runs between the cat4000s (whether it's just "across the floor" or whether there's cable running through a building) It may be substantially cheaper to aquire a MM fibre patch cable vs. purchasing LX GBIC/SFP modules.
.t
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisc...@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/







