11 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-portsnet/liveMedia live.2004.11.11.tar.gz ...| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Michael C. Shultz | Nov 12, 2004 8:28 am | |
| Frank Laszlo | Nov 12, 2004 9:10 am | |
| Frank Laszlo | Nov 12, 2004 10:10 am | |
| Norikatsu Shigemura | Nov 12, 2004 11:51 am | |
| Norikatsu Shigemura | Nov 12, 2004 12:11 pm | |
| Frank Laszlo | Nov 12, 2004 12:50 pm | |
| Norikatsu Shigemura | Nov 12, 2004 3:58 pm | |
| Michael C. Shultz | Nov 12, 2004 4:15 pm | |
| Frank J. Laszlo | Nov 13, 2004 10:45 am | |
| Michael Johnson | Nov 13, 2004 10:51 am | |
| Frank J. Laszlo | Nov 13, 2004 10:55 am |
| Subject: | net/liveMedia live.2004.11.11.tar.gz not fetchable agian | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Frank Laszlo (lasz...@vonostingroup.com) | |
| Date: | Nov 12, 2004 10:10:38 am | |
| List: | org.freebsd.freebsd-ports | |
Michael C. Shultz wrote:
Michael C. Shultz wrote: On Friday 12 November 2004 09:10 am, you wrote:
The DISTNAME is obviously wrong. Maybe live.com decided to change their naming scheme.
Regards, Frank Laszlo
Here are other liveMedia files from my ports/distfiles directory. The name liveMedia live.2004.11.11.tar.gz seems consistant.....
/usr/ports/distfiles/live.2004.09.02.tar.gz
/usr/ports/distfiles/live.2004.10.26.tar.gz
/usr/ports/distfiles/live.2004.10.11.tar.gz
/usr/ports/distfiles/live.2004.10.28a.tar.gz
/usr/ports/distfiles/live.2004.10.14.tar.gz
/usr/ports/distfiles/live.2004.11.01.tar.gz
/usr/ports/distfiles/live.2004.10.18.tar.gz
/usr/ports/distfiles/live.2004.11.02.tar.gz
/usr/ports/distfiles/live.2004.10.19.tar.gz
/usr/ports/distfiles/live.2004.11.09a.tar.gz
/usr/ports/distfiles/live.2004.10.22.tar.gz
Not exactly, as you can see there is a couple with an 'a' after it.
/usr/ports/distfiles/live.2004.10.28a.tar.gz /usr/ports/distfiles/live.2004.11.09a.tar.gz
Michael Johnson has informed me that this means there is multiple releases in the same day. Maybe the port should address this? Also, I see that DISTNAME is statically set, and if infact live.com creates build daily and doesnt archive old builds, this needs to be updated to reflect the current date in the DISTNAME to retrieve the proper distfile. If the maintainer is unresponsive, I would be willing to write a patch for this. Hope this helps.
Regards, Frank Laszlo