atom feed33 messages in net.java.dev.spots.devRe: Re[2]: radio update
FromSent OnAttachments
Ron GoldmanMar 2, 2009 5:06 pm 
Eric ArseneauMar 2, 2009 6:09 pm 
Pete St. PierreMar 2, 2009 6:35 pm 
Eric ArseneauMar 2, 2009 8:00 pm 
John DanielsMar 2, 2009 11:43 pm 
Pete St. PierreMar 3, 2009 8:41 am 
Ron GoldmanMar 4, 2009 3:14 am 
John DanielsMar 4, 2009 7:12 am 
Markus BestehornMar 4, 2009 7:57 am 
Randy SmithMar 4, 2009 8:20 am 
John DanielsMar 4, 2009 8:51 am 
Arshan PoursohiMar 4, 2009 8:51 am 
Randy SmithMar 4, 2009 8:51 am 
John DanielsMar 4, 2009 9:16 am 
John DanielsMar 4, 2009 9:24 am 
Eric ArseneauMar 4, 2009 9:28 am 
Eric ArseneauMar 4, 2009 9:31 am 
Markus BestehornMar 4, 2009 10:03 am 
Robert TaylorMar 4, 2009 10:50 am 
John DanielsMar 4, 2009 11:24 am 
Ron GoldmanMar 4, 2009 11:27 am 
John DanielsMar 4, 2009 11:30 am 
John DanielsMar 4, 2009 11:37 am 
Eric ArseneauMar 4, 2009 11:38 am 
Eric ArseneauMar 4, 2009 11:39 am 
Dave ClealMar 4, 2009 12:22 pm 
Eric ArseneauMar 4, 2009 12:43 pm 
Randy SmithMar 4, 2009 3:43 pm 
John DanielsMar 4, 2009 10:54 pm 
John DanielsMar 5, 2009 8:16 am 
Markus BestehornMar 5, 2009 10:43 am 
Markus BestehornMar 6, 2009 9:19 am.jpg
Markus BestehornMar 11, 2009 6:26 am 
Subject:Re: Re[2]: radio update
From:Randy Smith (rand@sun.com)
Date:Mar 4, 2009 8:51:50 am
List:net.java.dev.spots.dev

On Mar 4, 2009, at 7:13 AM, John Daniels wrote:

Ron, I really think it's time to create a proper test rig that allows repeatable and consistent multihop testing. I discussed the idea with Pete and Bob more than a year ago, and Bob seemed ready to create a hardware set up with SPOTs connected via coax instead of aerials, so that the set of receivers can be accurately controlled. If you had, say, a matrix of 16 SPOTs with controllable pathways you'd be able to conduct some very meaningful experiments. A simpler form of that rig would be very useful for Eric, too, for the continuous test system.

--John

Cool idea, I guess each SPOT would be in a faraday cage. Coax between boxes, with a simple antenna from the coax to inside the box -- would let you simply drop the SPOT inside (?)

Oops, anything going into SPOT B's box would also leave it, so this wouldn't be so good for A-B-C tests in which A cannot see C.

--Randy