19 messages in org.opensolaris.dtrace-discuss[dtrace-discuss] Missing -G flag in O...
FromSent OnAttachments
Robert LorOct 26, 2007 8:27 am 
Adam LeventhalOct 26, 2007 8:44 am 
Steve PetersOct 26, 2007 10:08 am 
Adam LeventhalOct 26, 2007 10:37 am 
Jarod JensonOct 26, 2007 11:57 am 
Robert LorOct 26, 2007 1:37 pm 
Adam LeventhalOct 26, 2007 2:25 pm 
Robert LorOct 26, 2007 2:51 pm 
Adam LeventhalOct 26, 2007 3:27 pm 
Adam LeventhalOct 27, 2007 9:39 am 
James McIlreeOct 29, 2007 1:42 pm 
Adam LeventhalOct 29, 2007 4:48 pm 
James McIlreeOct 29, 2007 5:44 pm 
Adam LeventhalOct 30, 2007 6:16 pm 
Steve PetersOct 31, 2007 9:17 am 
Adam LeventhalOct 31, 2007 9:21 am 
Robert LorNov 2, 2007 1:36 pm 
James McIlreeNov 5, 2007 11:50 am 
Robert LorNov 5, 2007 2:36 pm 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:[dtrace-discuss] Missing -G flag in OSX Dtrace portActions...
From:Adam Leventhal (ah@eng.sun.com)
Date:Oct 27, 2007 9:39:11 am
List:org.opensolaris.dtrace-discuss

To all USDT developers: you should definitely start using 'dtrace -h' To Apple: you should make dtrace -G a no-op so that said developers don't have to change their Makefiles

... and if you want to be really kind, dtrace -G could generate a dummy object file (again, so developers don't have to change their Makefiles).

Adam