4 messages in net.sourceforge.lists.courier-usersRE: [courier-users] SPF keyword question
FromSent OnAttachments
Randy SmithDec 21, 2004 3:25 pm 
Sam VarshavchikDec 21, 2004 4:05 pm 
Randy "PerlStalker" SmithDec 22, 2004 8:25 am 
Julian MehnleDec 22, 2004 9:39 am 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:RE: [courier-users] SPF keyword questionActions...
From:Julian Mehnle (bu@mehnle.net)
Date:Dec 22, 2004 9:39:39 am
List:net.sourceforge.lists.courier-users

Randy "PerlStalker" Smith [perl@falconsroost.alamosa.co.us] wrote:

Sam Varshavchik wrote:

There's been several different versions of SPF documentation floating around.

Courier uses the logic documented in draft-mengwong-spf-01.txt, see that document for the definition of these results.

Are there any concerns that the different specs could conflict (now or in the future)? (Let's ingore MS's attempt to embrace and extend it for the purposes of this discussion. :-))

Actually, <http://spf.pobox.com/spf-draft-200406.txt> is the current authoritative draft, but it has only minor editorial differences to <http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-01.txt>.

(There is another draft by Mark Lentczner, <http://www.ozonehouse.com/mark/spf/draft-lentczner-spf-00.txt>, but this one is unofficial.)

The SPF project is currently working on creating a new official draft which should resolve most of the open issues of the current official draft. It should be ready in Q1 of 2005.