4 messages in net.nether.puck.cisco-nsp[c-nsp] is it possible to set MED on ...
FromSent OnAttachments
Pierfrancesco CaciJan 5, 2005 10:22 am 
Vinny AbelloJan 6, 2005 12:33 am 
Manoj koshtiJan 6, 2005 3:29 pm 
Pierfrancesco CaciJan 10, 2005 9:38 am 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:[c-nsp] is it possible to set MED on a default route ?Actions...
From:Pierfrancesco Caci (p.c@seabone.net)
Date:Jan 5, 2005 10:22:32 am
List:net.nether.puck.cisco-nsp

Hello, I have a customer that is asking for 2 circuits to be configured as main and protection. They also asked for the default route to be announced over BGP, and they have another provider that I know nothing of.

The situation is more or less this:

Work My-router-A --------| Customer ----- Other transit My-router-B --------| Prot

Now, for what they announce to me, they can set a MED on the outgoing route-map and it will just work.

But for what I announce to them, if they lower the localpref on the protection circuit, in case of fault all traffic will go to the other transit. As I am announcing them only the default route, can they set different MEDs on these 2 defaults in their inbound route-map ?

Pf