atom feed12 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-stableRe: 2.2.5-stable is now in BETA test.
FromSent OnAttachments
Jordan K. HubbardMar 9, 1998 4:25 pm 
Chad R. LarsonMar 9, 1998 4:30 pm 
Matt BehrensMar 9, 1998 5:23 pm 
Richard WackerbarthMar 9, 1998 5:59 pm 
Jordan K. HubbardMar 9, 1998 6:01 pm 
Jordan K. HubbardMar 9, 1998 6:11 pm 
Matt BehrensMar 9, 1998 6:49 pm 
Satoshi AsamiMar 9, 1998 6:56 pm 
Jordan K. HubbardMar 9, 1998 7:00 pm 
Rodney W. GrimesMar 10, 1998 7:51 am 
Rodney W. GrimesMar 10, 1998 7:53 am 
M. Warner LoshMar 10, 1998 1:19 pm 
Subject:Re: 2.2.5-stable is now in BETA test.
From:Richard Wackerbarth (rk@dataplex.net)
Date:Mar 9, 1998 5:59:17 pm
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-stable

At 7:23 PM -0600 3/9/98, Matt Behrens wrote:

On Mon, 9 Mar 1998, Chad R. Larson wrote:

Ummm... I probably won't be the only one who asks, "Should that subject line reference 2.2.6?

It's 2.2.5-STABLE until 3.0 moves into STABLE. 2.2.6-RELEASE, sure! 2.2.6-BETA, maybe. But not 2.2.6-STABLE. (:

The status of the 2.2 branch is not a function of the status of the 3.0 branch. 2.1 is still a "STABLE" branch.

Frankly, I wish that people would think of "DEVELOPMENT", "ALPHA", "BETA", "STABLE", etc. as descriptions of the state of a development tree rather than the name of it.

Once a branch reaches "stability", is SHOULD remain that way. Unfortunately, some enhancements/corrections have the undesirable effect of temporarily destablizing things. However, that is a risk that you take in grabbing the head of the branch rather than some point that has received enough testing to validate its stability.

In particular, we are now in a beta test phase anticipating the 2.2.6 release.

mkdir FreeBSD ; cd FreeBSD mkdir FreeBSD-2.1 populate it mkdir FreeBSD-2.2 populate it mkdir FreeBSD-3.0 populate it

ln -s FreeBSD-2.2 FreeBSD-STABLE ln -s FreeBSD-3.0 FreeBSD-DEVELOPMENT

ln -s FreeBSD-2.2 FreeBSD-2.2.6-BETA

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message