4 messages in org.w3.xproc-dev[closed] Re: declaring an atomic step
FromSent OnAttachments
James SulakDec 14, 2008 6:49 pm 
Norman WalshDec 14, 2008 7:04 pm 
James SulakDec 14, 2008 7:35 pm 
Norman WalshDec 19, 2008 12:37 pm 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:[closed] Re: declaring an atomic stepActions...
From:Norman Walsh (nd@nwalsh.com)
Date:Dec 19, 2008 12:37:39 pm
List:org.w3.xproc-dev

"James Sulak" <jsu@gmail.com> writes:

Thanks, Norm, that makes sense. I'm finding that the difference between atomic steps and compound steps is one of the more confusing bits of the spec.

Hmm. I'm open to suggestions for spec improvement.

Be seeing you, norm

-- Norman Walsh <nd@nwalsh.com> | No man is more than another if he does http://nwalsh.com/ | no more than another.-- Cervantes