

![]() | Start a set with this search |
![]() | Include this search in one of my sets |
![]() | Exclude this search from one of my sets |
![]() | Permalink to these results Paste this link in email or IM: |
| Atom feed for tracking future search results Paste this URL into your reader: |
9 messages in com.googlegroups.h2-databaseRe: Timeout trying to lock... [HYT00-50]| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Thomas Wiradikusuma | Dec 19, 2007 12:20 am | |
| Thomas Mueller | Dec 22, 2007 1:29 am | |
| Thomas Mueller | Dec 22, 2007 1:31 am | |
| Thomas Wiradikusuma | Dec 22, 2007 3:27 am | |
| Thomas Mueller | Dec 26, 2007 8:42 am | |
| Thomas Wiradikusuma | Dec 26, 2007 7:52 pm | |
| Thomas Wiradikusuma | Dec 26, 2007 8:23 pm | |
| Thomas Mueller | Dec 28, 2007 8:05 am | |
| Thomas Wiradikusuma | Dec 28, 2007 9:14 am |

![]() | Permalink for this message Paste this link in email or IM: |
![]() | Permalink for this thread Paste this link in email or IM: |
| Atom feed for this thread Paste this URL into your reader: |
| Subject: | Re: Timeout trying to lock... [HYT00-50] | Actions... |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Thomas Wiradikusuma (wira...@gmail.com) | |
| Date: | Dec 22, 2007 3:27:35 am | |
| List: | com.googlegroups.h2-database | |
Exactly. That's why I'm confused. FYI I'm using Spring's @Transactional. The same code works OK in MySQL.
A possible bug in H2?
Regards, Thomas
On 12/22/07, Thomas Mueller <thom...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
I just read:
Isolation read uncommitted
I don't think this isolation level is really in use, because in this mode lock timeouts can not happen (as far as I know).
Regards, Thomas
On Dec 22, 2007 10:29 AM, Thomas Mueller <thom...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
According to the exception code (-50) you are using version 1.0.50 from 2007-06-17. You should consider using a newer version. In newer versions, read committed is the default isolation level (like in most other databases). With older versions (including the version you are using), the default isolation level is serializable, where such scenarios can easily lead to lock timeout.
Regards, Thomas
On Dec 19, 2007 9:20 AM, Thomas Wiradikusuma <wira...@gmail.com> wrote:
hello guys, i'm experiencing this exception everytime I want to remove/save row.
org.h2.jdbc.JdbcBatchUpdateException: Timeout trying to lock table CONTENTASSETRESPONSE [HYT00-50] at org.h2.jdbc.JdbcPreparedStatement.executeBatch ( JdbcPreparedStatement.java: 1040) at org.apache.commons.dbcp.DelegatingStatement.executeBatch( DelegatingStatement.java: 297) at org.apache.commons.dbcp.DelegatingStatement.executeBatch( DelegatingStatement.java : 297) at org.hibernate.jdbc.BatchingBatcher.doExecuteBatch(BatchingBatcher.java: 48) at org.hibernate.jdbc.AbstractBatcher.executeBatch(AbstractBatcher.java: 242) at org.hibernate.engine.ActionQueue.executeActions ( ActionQueue.java: 235) at org.hibernate.engine.ActionQueue.executeActions( ActionQueue.java: 139) at org.hibernate.event.def.AbstractFlushingEventListener.performExecutions( AbstractFlushingEventListener.java : 298) at org.hibernate.event.def.DefaultFlushEventListener.onFlush( DefaultFlushEventListener.java: 27) at org.hibernate.impl.SessionImpl.flush(SessionImpl.java:1000) at org.hibernate.impl.SessionImpl.managedFlush (SessionImpl.java :338) at org.hibernate.transaction.JDBCTransaction.commit(JDBCTransaction.java: 106) at org.springframework.orm.hibernate3.HibernateTransactionManager.doCommit( HibernateTransactionManager.java : 578) at
org.springframework.transaction.support.AbstractPlatformTransactionManager.processCommit
(AbstractPlatformTransactionManager.java: 662) at
org.springframework.transaction.support.AbstractPlatformTransactionManager.commit(
AbstractPlatformTransactionManager.java: 632) at
org.springframework.transaction.interceptor.TransactionAspectSupport.commitTransactionAfterReturning
(TransactionAspectSupport.java: 314) at
org.springframework.transaction.interceptor.TransactionInterceptor.invoke
(TransactionInterceptor.java: 116) at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed( ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java : 171) at org.springframework.aop.framework.JdkDynamicAopProxy.invoke( JdkDynamicAopProxy.java: 204)
if I do this in sequence (assuming the record/row is there), I'm using Hibernate: - load from DB - change some value in the object (ex. obj.setName("thomas")) - remove from DB everything is OK
but if I create n threads (each thread handle different object <-- from different row), the expection happens, and the rows are not deleted BUT the data is changed (contents of "name" changed to "thomas").
i use Hibernate/Spring transaction support, Isolation read uncommitted, auto-commit.
any hint? thx in advance.
regards, Thomas Wiradikusuma
-- salam hangat, Thomas Wiradikusuma http://wiradikusuma.blogspot.com/ <-- Tidak putih, tidak dapat cinta sejati







