atom feed16 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.tagRe: [tag] Groups - TA Anatomy V0.4 (A...
FromSent OnAttachments
jdur...@us.fujitsu.comSep 19, 2007 5:24 pm 
Dave PawsonSep 19, 2007 11:57 pm 
Dave PawsonSep 20, 2007 12:21 am 
step...@systml.co.ukSep 20, 2007 6:47 am 
Dave PawsonSep 20, 2007 6:53 am 
step...@systml.co.ukSep 20, 2007 10:45 am 
Durand, Jacques R.Sep 20, 2007 2:36 pm 
step...@systml.co.ukSep 20, 2007 11:29 pm 
Dave PawsonSep 20, 2007 11:53 pm 
Dave PawsonSep 21, 2007 12:01 am 
Dave PawsonSep 21, 2007 12:05 am 
step...@systml.co.ukSep 21, 2007 9:10 am 
step...@systml.co.ukSep 21, 2007 1:15 pm 
Dave PawsonSep 21, 2007 10:36 pm 
step...@systml.co.ukSep 22, 2007 2:26 am 
Dave PawsonSep 22, 2007 5:11 am 
Subject:Re: [tag] Groups - TA Anatomy V0.4 (AnatomyTA-v04.doc) uploaded
From:step...@systml.co.uk (step@systml.co.uk)
Date:Sep 20, 2007 10:45:59 am
List:org.oasis-open.lists.tag

Quoting Dave Pawson <dave@gmail.com>:

On 20/09/2007, step@systml.co.uk <step@systml.co.uk> wrote:

Isn't the main factor here wanting to make the test assertion into an expression with a boolean evaluation (a predicate - I think we need to explain that term by the way)?

Why complicate it Stephen? We want a pass/fail result is simpler?

So are we making it then a convention that true = pass ? i.e. TRUE for a predicate TA result equates to PASS for prose TA narrative

If so, maybe we should state that explicitly

Don't we need to be clear which parts of the model evaluate to true/false and which parts to pass/fail?