Quoting Dave Pawson <dave...@gmail.com>:
On 20/09/2007, step...@systml.co.uk <step...@systml.co.uk> wrote:
Isn't the main factor here wanting to make the test assertion into an
expression with a boolean evaluation (a predicate - I think we need to
explain that term by the way)?
Why complicate it Stephen? We want a pass/fail result is simpler?
So are we making it then a convention that true = pass ?
i.e. TRUE for a predicate TA result equates to PASS for prose TA narrative
If so, maybe we should state that explicitly
Don't we need to be clear which parts of the model evaluate to true/false
and which parts to pass/fail?