Messages per Month
13 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-archnewbus flaw| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Dag-Erling Smørgrav | May 11, 2004 7:39 am | |
| Doug Rabson | May 11, 2004 8:08 am | |
| Poul-Henning Kamp | May 11, 2004 8:12 am | |
| John-Mark Gurney | May 11, 2004 6:02 pm | |
| Dag-Erling Smørgrav | May 12, 2004 6:27 am | |
| John-Mark Gurney | May 12, 2004 10:41 am | |
| Dag-Erling Smørgrav | May 12, 2004 10:48 am | |
| John-Mark Gurney | May 12, 2004 10:53 am | |
| Dag-Erling Smørgrav | May 12, 2004 1:30 pm | |
| Doug Rabson | May 13, 2004 1:27 am | |
| Dag-Erling Smørgrav | May 13, 2004 3:46 am | |
| Doug Rabson | May 13, 2004 5:34 am | |
| M. Warner Losh | May 13, 2004 9:06 am |
| Subject: | newbus flaw | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | M. Warner Losh (im...@bsdimp.com) | |
| Date: | May 13, 2004 9:06:27 am | |
| List: | org.freebsd.freebsd-arch | |
In message: <xzps...@dwp.des.no> de...@des.no (Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav) writes: : Doug Rabson <df...@nlsystems.com> writes: : > When the old module unloaded, its driver will have detached from the : > device which it created. There is no reference to an old driver_t. Its : > perfectly safe for the new driver to use the old device. : : so why do you say I "shouldn't reset the old driver and desc"?
subr_bus.c does that already on detach. The association between devclass and device_t is done just prior to probe being called on a per device basis.
Warner