atom feed15 messages in at.iem.pd-listRe: [PD] execution order for ~ object...
FromSent OnAttachments
Damian StewartSep 25, 2008 4:51 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigSep 25, 2008 5:21 am 
Claude Heiland-AllenSep 25, 2008 5:29 am 
Thomas GrillSep 25, 2008 6:16 am 
Frank BarknechtSep 25, 2008 6:16 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigSep 25, 2008 6:21 am 
Thomas GrillSep 25, 2008 9:31 am 
hard offSep 26, 2008 6:31 am 
IOhannes m zmölnigSep 26, 2008 8:44 am 
Damian StewartSep 26, 2008 9:24 am 
IOhannes m zmölnigSep 26, 2008 9:37 am 
Damian StewartSep 26, 2008 10:11 am 
IOhannes m zmölnigSep 26, 2008 10:13 am 
IOhannes m zmölnigSep 26, 2008 10:14 am 
Claude Heiland-AllenSep 26, 2008 10:24 am 
Subject:Re: [PD] execution order for ~ objects that output messages
From:IOhannes m zmölnig (zmoe@iem.at)
Date:Sep 26, 2008 10:14:11 am
List:at.iem.pd-list

Damian Stewart wrote:

IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:

now, signal-to-message objects _should_ accept this scheduling, by *not* sending messages in the dsp callback, but rather schedule them to the next tick (via a "[delay 0]") afaik all _internal_ objects adhere to this.

hm, again.. so, at what point do these invisible '[delay 0]' objects output their messages? do they end up at the 'head' or the 'tail' (so to speak) of the 'message avalanche'? or are they somewhere in the middle?

at the head. always

gmadsr IOhannes

_______________________________________________ Pd-l@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list