11 messages in net.java.dev.jna.usersRe: [jna-users] Fwd: https://jna.dev....
FromSent OnAttachments
Timothy WallFeb 29, 2008 5:14 am 
Paul LoyFeb 29, 2008 6:10 am 
Timothy WallFeb 29, 2008 7:07 am 
Timothy WallFeb 29, 2008 7:46 am 
DiegoFeb 29, 2008 8:15 am 
Emmanuel PirschFeb 29, 2008 8:55 am 
Duncan McGregorFeb 29, 2008 9:41 am 
Jøran Vagnby LillesandMar 1, 2008 3:49 am 
Timothy WallMar 2, 2008 6:10 am 
Hackett, MarkMay 8, 2008 5:41 am.html
Timothy WallMay 9, 2008 11:19 am 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:Re: [jna-users] Fwd: https://jna.dev.java.net/#demosActions...
From:Emmanuel Pirsch (emma@pirsch.org)
Date:Feb 29, 2008 8:55:46 am
List:net.java.dev.jna.users

I think the JNA documentation is not lacking at all. The Javadoc is pretty extensive and the getting started and samples are nice addition to it.

It took me just a few hours to write an interface to the Lego Mindstorm Fantom API... without previous knowledge of JNA and without previous knowledge of the said API. And I did not hit any major snags.

Of course, the samples are pretty simple and do not include examples for every situations. They can be improved on, but I don't believe this is the responsibility of only the JNA developers, but also of the whole JNA community.

Emmanuel Pirsch <http://epirsch.blogspot.com/>