atom feed75 messages in at.iem.pd-listRe: [PD] PDDP meeting?
FromSent OnAttachments
Hans-Christoph SteinerApr 18, 2006 4:34 pm 
Mark PolishookApr 18, 2006 6:23 pm 
dafydd hughesApr 18, 2006 9:33 pm 
Koray TahirogluApr 18, 2006 11:32 pm 
adam armfieldApr 19, 2006 6:43 am 
derek holzerApr 19, 2006 8:07 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerApr 19, 2006 4:20 pm 
David PowersApr 20, 2006 10:40 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerApr 21, 2006 1:34 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerApr 21, 2006 1:36 am 
adamApr 21, 2006 3:23 am 
adamApr 21, 2006 3:48 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigApr 21, 2006 4:49 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigApr 21, 2006 5:45 am 
Koray TahirogluApr 21, 2006 5:57 am 
B. BogartApr 21, 2006 8:15 am 
dafydd hughesApr 21, 2006 8:24 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerApr 22, 2006 11:04 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerApr 22, 2006 11:06 am 
adamApr 23, 2006 10:13 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerApr 25, 2006 9:06 am 
derek holzerApr 25, 2006 11:49 am 
David PowersApr 25, 2006 12:33 pm 
day 5Apr 25, 2006 12:39 pm 
João Miguel PaisApr 26, 2006 1:26 am.txt
adamApr 26, 2006 3:06 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerApr 26, 2006 3:24 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerApr 26, 2006 3:29 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerApr 26, 2006 3:30 am 
David PowersApr 26, 2006 12:48 pm 
day 5Apr 26, 2006 1:53 pm 
Hans-Christoph SteinerApr 26, 2006 2:20 pm 
s.koepfApr 26, 2006 2:42 pm 
Mathieu BouchardApr 28, 2006 4:13 pm 
Mathieu BouchardApr 30, 2006 9:58 am 
Tim BlechmannApr 30, 2006 10:26 am 
Mathieu BouchardApr 30, 2006 10:33 am 
Mathieu BouchardApr 30, 2006 10:39 am 
Chris McCormickApr 30, 2006 6:21 pm 
Mathieu BouchardMay 1, 2006 7:36 am 
Chris McCormickMay 1, 2006 6:37 pm 
Mathieu BouchardMay 1, 2006 8:17 pm 
Mathieu BouchardMay 1, 2006 9:13 pm 
Chris McCormickMay 1, 2006 10:47 pm 
Mathieu BouchardMay 5, 2006 1:34 pm 
Arie van SchutterhoefMay 5, 2006 1:56 pm 
Mathieu BouchardMay 5, 2006 2:12 pm 
Tim BlechmannMay 5, 2006 2:35 pm 
day 5May 5, 2006 4:55 pm 
Frank BarknechtMay 6, 2006 1:18 am 
Chris McCormickMay 6, 2006 5:56 am 
Arie van SchutterhoefMay 6, 2006 6:35 am 
Mathieu BouchardMay 6, 2006 11:37 am 
Mathieu BouchardMay 6, 2006 11:42 am 
Mathieu BouchardMay 6, 2006 11:56 am 
Mathieu BouchardMay 6, 2006 12:39 pm 
Arie van SchutterhoefMay 6, 2006 1:25 pm 
Frank BarknechtMay 6, 2006 3:09 pm 
Mathieu BouchardMay 6, 2006 4:56 pm 
Arie van SchutterhoefMay 6, 2006 5:41 pm 
geigerMay 7, 2006 6:15 am 
Mathieu BouchardMay 7, 2006 12:22 pm 
Arie van SchutterhoefMay 7, 2006 3:14 pm 
Chris McCormickMay 7, 2006 6:24 pm 
Chris McCormickMay 7, 2006 6:51 pm 
Mathieu BouchardMay 7, 2006 8:37 pm 
geigerMay 8, 2006 3:20 am 
geigerMay 8, 2006 3:28 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerMay 8, 2006 6:21 am 
Krzysztof CzajaMay 8, 2006 4:58 pm 
Mathieu BouchardMay 8, 2006 10:51 pm 
Frank BarknechtMay 9, 2006 12:42 am 
SteffenMay 14, 2006 4:01 am 
B. BogartAug 26, 2006 10:45 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerAug 26, 2006 11:04 am 
Subject:Re: [PD] PDDP meeting?
From:Chris McCormick (chr@mccormick.cx)
Date:May 6, 2006 5:56:25 am
List:at.iem.pd-list

On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 11:35:44PM +0200, Tim Blechmann wrote:

On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 16:34 -0400, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:

that maybe the original intention of the Pd language isn't to be a fully fledged programming language, but instead an artist's tool with some dataflow programming-like features.

well, especially being an artistic tool, it shouldn't require the user to learn 1001 workarounds for trivial problems, nor should the user have to worry about obscure message vs. list problems ...

True. It guess you'd hope that it would be as easy as possible to make art with such a tool.

I'm always talking about what Pd could become and all I get answered is what Pd was meant to be.

i'm not sure, if anyone can say, what pd is meant to be ... but matju is right about one thing ... pd can't be improved, when everyone ignores it's weaknesses ("you don't want to load soundfiles clickfree", "you don't need to use tables on the x86_64 architecture") ...

I am not against making Pd better. I am not against talking about what features would be good in Pd. I am not against someone forking Pd and making something amazing and new and wonderful. I am not against somebody cloning all the ideas in Pd and making something which is a generic dataflow programming environment with all the bells and whilstles of a fully fledged programming language. That is all excellent - more great free software for all of us.

The thing I find tiresome is people's attitude and disrespect towards other developers when they find what they see as flaws in Pd. That is probably all in my head since nobody else seems to see it, and anyway, I'm not a developer so I should let others continue with their opinions and hostile attitudes, and leave it alone and just go back to making weird sounds with computers.

Apologies for the disturbance. Nothing to see, move along.

Best regards,

Chris.