atom feed30 messages in org.apache.lucene.java-devRe: Whither Query Norm?
FromSent OnAttachments
Grant IngersollNov 20, 2009 7:55 am 
Mark MillerNov 20, 2009 8:04 am 
Jake MannixNov 20, 2009 8:14 am 
Mark MillerNov 20, 2009 8:14 am 
Jake MannixNov 20, 2009 8:18 am 
Grant IngersollNov 20, 2009 10:08 am 
Jake MannixNov 20, 2009 10:24 am 
Grant IngersollNov 20, 2009 1:58 pm 
Mark MillerNov 20, 2009 2:24 pm 
Jake MannixNov 20, 2009 2:31 pm 
Mark MillerNov 20, 2009 2:39 pm 
Mark MillerNov 20, 2009 2:50 pm 
Jake MannixNov 20, 2009 3:39 pm 
Mark MillerNov 20, 2009 4:09 pm 
Mark MillerNov 20, 2009 4:20 pm 
Jake MannixNov 20, 2009 4:36 pm 
Jake MannixNov 20, 2009 4:42 pm 
Jake MannixNov 20, 2009 4:49 pm 
Mark MillerNov 20, 2009 4:49 pm 
Mark MillerNov 20, 2009 4:51 pm 
Jake MannixNov 20, 2009 4:56 pm 
Mark MillerNov 20, 2009 5:02 pm 
Jake MannixNov 20, 2009 5:10 pm 
Jake MannixNov 20, 2009 5:13 pm 
Otis GospodneticNov 24, 2009 9:18 pm 
Otis GospodneticNov 24, 2009 9:31 pm 
Jake MannixNov 24, 2009 9:39 pm 
Jake MannixNov 24, 2009 9:43 pm 
Jake MannixNov 24, 2009 9:55 pm 
Jake MannixNov 24, 2009 10:30 pm 
Subject:Re: Whither Query Norm?
From:Mark Miller (mark@gmail.com)
Date:Nov 20, 2009 4:20:20 pm
List:org.apache.lucene.java-dev

it looks expensive to me to do both of them properly.

Okay - I guess that somewhat makes sense - you can calculate the magnitude of the doc vectors at index time. How is that impossible with incremental indexing though? Isn't it just expensive? Seems somewhat expensive in the non incremental case as well - your just eating it at index time rather than query time - though the same could be done for incremental? The information is all there in either case.