atom feed8 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.docbookRe: [docbook] DocBook Technical Commi...
FromSent OnAttachments
Norman WalshAug 20, 2003 3:01 pm 
Tobias ReifAug 21, 2003 1:01 am 
Jeff BealAug 21, 2003 5:32 am 
Tobias ReifAug 21, 2003 6:59 am 
Paul GrossoAug 21, 2003 7:00 am 
Paul GrossoAug 21, 2003 7:10 am 
Tobias ReifAug 21, 2003 7:39 am 
Norman WalshOct 29, 2003 5:05 pm 
Subject:Re: [docbook] DocBook Technical Committee Meeting Minutes: 20 Aug 2003
From:Paul Grosso (pgro@arbortext.com)
Date:Aug 21, 2003 7:00:49 am
List:org.oasis-open.lists.docbook

At 18:20 2003 08 20 -0400, Norman Walsh wrote:

| 752632 Color control of CALS table ELEMENT

Reject: We've got attributes like role that could be used for this purpose, we've got PIs that could be used, and we have HTML tables if you can support them. There are lots of alternatives that don't involve changing a supported external standard.

Accepted.

While this is all fresh in our minds, we should be sure we have this recorded unambiguously.

I think Norm meant to label the first para I quote above "Proposed" and then put the word "Reject" in the text.

Then we Accepted the proposal which was to Reject the request.

As the minutes are written, I fear someone might read that and think we Accepted the request.

| 780734 inline code

Straw poll: should we add <code>:

Jeff Beal Y Steve Cogorno N Paul Grosso abstain Nancy Harrison Y Dick Hamilton N Scott Hudson Y Michael Smith Y Norman Walsh abstain

For the record, I would have voted Y to adding <code>.

Norm: Would anyone object to adding code?

None.

Proposal: Add a code element.

Accepted.