Reject: We've got attributes like role that could be used for this purpose,
we've got PIs that could be used, and we have HTML tables if you
can support them. There are lots of alternatives that don't involve
changing a supported external standard.
While this is all fresh in our minds, we should be sure
we have this recorded unambiguously.
I think Norm meant to label the first para I quote above
"Proposed" and then put the word "Reject" in the text.
Then we Accepted the proposal which was to Reject the request.
As the minutes are written, I fear someone might read that
and think we Accepted the request.
| 780734 inline code
Straw poll: should we add <code>:
Jeff Beal Y
Steve Cogorno N
Paul Grosso abstain
Nancy Harrison Y
Dick Hamilton N
Scott Hudson Y
Michael Smith Y
Norman Walsh abstain
For the record, I would have voted Y to adding <code>.