atom feed18 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.topicmaps-commentRe: [topicmaps-comment] Mapping Topic...
FromSent OnAttachments
W. Eliot KimberJul 11, 2002 12:32 pm 
Lars Marius GarsholJul 11, 2002 1:00 pm 
Thomas B. PassinJul 11, 2002 4:12 pm 
Lars Marius GarsholJul 12, 2002 12:30 am 
Murray AltheimJul 12, 2002 4:12 am 
Lars Marius GarsholJul 12, 2002 5:14 am 
Thomas B. PassinJul 12, 2002 5:26 am 
Murray AltheimJul 12, 2002 5:28 am 
Lars Marius GarsholJul 12, 2002 5:35 am 
Lars Marius GarsholJul 12, 2002 5:37 am 
Lars Marius GarsholJul 12, 2002 5:44 am 
Murray AltheimJul 12, 2002 6:26 am 
W. Eliot KimberJul 12, 2002 7:04 am 
Thomas B. PassinJul 12, 2002 6:09 pm 
Thomas B. PassinJul 12, 2002 6:25 pm 
Murray AltheimJul 15, 2002 4:40 am 
Thomas B. PassinJul 15, 2002 5:09 am 
Murray AltheimJul 15, 2002 6:16 am 
Subject:Re: [topicmaps-comment] Mapping Topics to Cyc: How To Handle Scope?
From:Lars Marius Garshol (lar@garshol.priv.no)
Date:Jul 12, 2002 12:30:40 am
List:org.oasis-open.lists.topicmaps-comment

* Thomas B. Passin | | I think there is need to have it either way for different purposes | (such as queries), but aside from that I have always understood it | to be an "OR" situation just as you do. The XTM spec says the the | context is the union of all the individual scopes, so it really has | to be a "OR" doesn't it?

XTM doesn't say that. It says very clearly that "This specification places no constraints on how applications interpret scope."

If you look at section 2.2.1.6 you'll also see that there is nothing at all about this issue there.