8 messages in net.sourceforge.lists.courier-usersRe: [courier-users] Re: feature reque...
FromSent OnAttachments
Olivier PoitreyDec 7, 2001 6:35 am 
Stephane EntenDec 20, 2001 2:19 pm 
Aly S.P DharshiDec 20, 2001 2:26 pm 
Sam VarshavchikDec 20, 2001 2:39 pm 
Stephane EntenDec 20, 2001 3:28 pm 
Olivier PoitreyDec 20, 2001 4:23 pm 
Todd LyonsDec 20, 2001 6:24 pm 
Mike HorwathDec 21, 2001 7:29 am 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:Re: [courier-users] Re: feature request for authdaemon: cache mechanismActions...
From:Mike Horwath (drec@Geeks.ORG)
Date:Dec 21, 2001 7:29:40 am
List:net.sourceforge.lists.courier-users

On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 06:24:12PM -0800, Todd Lyons wrote:

Olivier Poitrey wanted us to know:

Think of an user who gets hundreds of mails a day, because he might have subscribed to a lot of mailing lists, i don't think it's so uncommon... now imagine this user is not exactly alone on a medium to large size mailserver.

Expecting to Sam to design a caching scheme that outperforms a database is a bit much to ask I would think. If you're having problems with database performance, I'd suggest looking at the database itself as the bottleneck, not kludge something that shouldn't have to be a database.

Maybe I'm missing the big picture here, fill me in.

Don't forget that the database system is already probably caching some data, and a double cache won't necessarily help.

But that's just my $0.02.

-- Mike Horwath IRC: Drechsau drec@Geeks.ORG Home: 763-540-6815 1901 Sumter Ave N, Golden Valley, MN 55427 Opinions stated in this message, or any message posted by myself through my Geeks.ORG address, are mine and mine alone, period.