| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| 240 earlier messages | ||
| Rich Thompson | Feb 26, 2003 6:34 am | |
| Richard Jacob | Feb 26, 2003 6:48 am | |
| Andre Kramer | Feb 26, 2003 7:08 am | |
| Richard Jacob | Feb 26, 2003 7:29 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Feb 26, 2003 7:30 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Feb 26, 2003 7:34 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Feb 26, 2003 9:37 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Feb 26, 2003 2:34 pm | |
| Rich Thompson | Feb 27, 2003 6:33 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Feb 27, 2003 6:40 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Feb 28, 2003 9:41 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Feb 28, 2003 9:54 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Feb 28, 2003 9:57 am | |
| Andre Kramer | Feb 28, 2003 9:59 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Feb 28, 2003 10:02 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Feb 28, 2003 10:11 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Feb 28, 2003 10:19 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Feb 28, 2003 1:05 pm | |
| Rich Thompson | Feb 28, 2003 1:11 pm | |
| Rich Thompson | Feb 28, 2003 1:15 pm | |
| Richard Jacob | Mar 3, 2003 6:57 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 4, 2003 7:10 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 4, 2003 7:12 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 4, 2003 7:15 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 4, 2003 7:32 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 4, 2003 7:37 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 4, 2003 7:40 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 4, 2003 7:43 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 4, 2003 7:45 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 4, 2003 7:52 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 4, 2003 7:55 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 4, 2003 7:58 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 4, 2003 8:05 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 4, 2003 8:09 am | |
| Andre Kramer | Mar 4, 2003 8:29 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 5, 2003 5:39 pm | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 5, 2003 5:39 pm | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 5, 2003 5:39 pm | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 5, 2003 5:39 pm | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 5, 2003 5:39 pm | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 5, 2003 5:39 pm | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 5, 2003 5:39 pm | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 5, 2003 5:39 pm | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 5, 2003 5:39 pm | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 5, 2003 5:39 pm | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 5, 2003 5:39 pm | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 5, 2003 5:39 pm | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 5, 2003 5:39 pm | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 5, 2003 5:39 pm | |
| Andre Kramer | Mar 6, 2003 1:15 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 6, 2003 3:28 am | |
| Andre Kramer | Mar 6, 2003 3:39 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 6, 2003 3:43 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 6, 2003 3:48 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 6, 2003 4:01 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 6, 2003 4:12 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 6, 2003 4:19 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 6, 2003 4:28 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 6, 2003 4:38 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 6, 2003 4:44 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 6, 2003 4:51 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 6, 2003 4:55 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 6, 2003 5:23 am | |
| Kropp, Alan | Mar 6, 2003 10:33 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 6, 2003 10:54 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 7, 2003 4:32 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 10, 2003 7:25 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 12, 2003 7:46 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 12, 2003 9:52 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 13, 2003 6:17 am | |
| Subject: | RE: [wsrp-wsia] [change request #223] Supporting cloning requiressupporting releasePortlet | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Andre Kramer (andr...@eu.citrix.com) | |
| Date: | Mar 6, 2003 1:15:57 am | |
| List: | org.oasis-open.lists.wsrp-wsia | |
In that case, we should consider moving releasePortlet to the (required) markup factor? I would still like to have properties and clone optional for 1.0.
Should we also state whether a consumer releasing an offered portlet (one that has not been cloned) MUST be a null op or MUST throw a fault? I would prefer a null op as the consumer can always start using the portlet again.
regards, Andre
-----Original Message----- From: Rich Thompson [mailto:ric...@us.ibm.com] Sent: 05 March 2003 21:08 To: wsrp...@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [wsrp-wsia] [change request #223] Supporting cloning requires supporting releasePortlet
Document: Spec Section: 8 Page/Line: 49/40 Requested by: Rich Thompson Old text: Any Producer that supports cloning portlets on performBlockingInteraction() or performInteraction() invocations SHOULD support the releasePortlet() operation.
New text: Any Producer that supports cloning portlets on performBlockingInteraction() or performInteraction() invocations MUST support the releasePortlet() operation.
Reasoning: Why wouldn't this be a MUST?
---------------------------------------------------------------- To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
---------------------------------------------------------------- To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> .... ....





