atom feed310 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.wsrp-wsiaRE: [wsrp-wsia] [change request #223]...
FromSent OnAttachments
240 earlier messages
Rich ThompsonFeb 26, 2003 6:34 am 
Richard JacobFeb 26, 2003 6:48 am 
Andre KramerFeb 26, 2003 7:08 am 
Richard JacobFeb 26, 2003 7:29 am 
Rich ThompsonFeb 26, 2003 7:30 am 
Rich ThompsonFeb 26, 2003 7:34 am 
Rich ThompsonFeb 26, 2003 9:37 am 
Rich ThompsonFeb 26, 2003 2:34 pm 
Rich ThompsonFeb 27, 2003 6:33 am 
Rich ThompsonFeb 27, 2003 6:40 am 
Rich ThompsonFeb 28, 2003 9:41 am 
Rich ThompsonFeb 28, 2003 9:54 am 
Rich ThompsonFeb 28, 2003 9:57 am 
Andre KramerFeb 28, 2003 9:59 am 
Rich ThompsonFeb 28, 2003 10:02 am 
Rich ThompsonFeb 28, 2003 10:11 am 
Rich ThompsonFeb 28, 2003 10:19 am 
Rich ThompsonFeb 28, 2003 1:05 pm 
Rich ThompsonFeb 28, 2003 1:11 pm 
Rich ThompsonFeb 28, 2003 1:15 pm 
Richard JacobMar 3, 2003 6:57 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 4, 2003 7:10 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 4, 2003 7:12 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 4, 2003 7:15 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 4, 2003 7:32 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 4, 2003 7:37 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 4, 2003 7:40 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 4, 2003 7:43 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 4, 2003 7:45 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 4, 2003 7:52 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 4, 2003 7:55 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 4, 2003 7:58 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 4, 2003 8:05 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 4, 2003 8:09 am 
Andre KramerMar 4, 2003 8:29 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 5, 2003 5:39 pm 
Rich ThompsonMar 5, 2003 5:39 pm 
Rich ThompsonMar 5, 2003 5:39 pm 
Rich ThompsonMar 5, 2003 5:39 pm 
Rich ThompsonMar 5, 2003 5:39 pm 
Rich ThompsonMar 5, 2003 5:39 pm 
Rich ThompsonMar 5, 2003 5:39 pm 
Rich ThompsonMar 5, 2003 5:39 pm 
Rich ThompsonMar 5, 2003 5:39 pm 
Rich ThompsonMar 5, 2003 5:39 pm 
Rich ThompsonMar 5, 2003 5:39 pm 
Rich ThompsonMar 5, 2003 5:39 pm 
Rich ThompsonMar 5, 2003 5:39 pm 
Rich ThompsonMar 5, 2003 5:39 pm 
Andre KramerMar 6, 2003 1:15 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 6, 2003 3:28 am 
Andre KramerMar 6, 2003 3:39 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 6, 2003 3:43 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 6, 2003 3:48 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 6, 2003 4:01 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 6, 2003 4:12 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 6, 2003 4:19 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 6, 2003 4:28 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 6, 2003 4:38 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 6, 2003 4:44 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 6, 2003 4:51 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 6, 2003 4:55 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 6, 2003 5:23 am 
Kropp, AlanMar 6, 2003 10:33 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 6, 2003 10:54 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 7, 2003 4:32 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 10, 2003 7:25 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 12, 2003 7:46 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 12, 2003 9:52 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 13, 2003 6:17 am 
Subject:RE: [wsrp-wsia] [change request #223] Supporting cloning requiressupporting releasePortlet
From:Andre Kramer (andr@eu.citrix.com)
Date:Mar 6, 2003 1:15:57 am
List:org.oasis-open.lists.wsrp-wsia

In that case, we should consider moving releasePortlet to the (required) markup factor? I would still like to have properties and clone optional for 1.0.

Should we also state whether a consumer releasing an offered portlet (one that has not been cloned) MUST be a null op or MUST throw a fault? I would prefer a null op as the consumer can always start using the portlet again.

regards, Andre

-----Original Message----- From: Rich Thompson [mailto:ric@us.ibm.com] Sent: 05 March 2003 21:08 To: wsrp@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [wsrp-wsia] [change request #223] Supporting cloning requires supporting releasePortlet

Document: Spec Section: 8 Page/Line: 49/40 Requested by: Rich Thompson Old text: Any Producer that supports cloning portlets on performBlockingInteraction() or performInteraction() invocations SHOULD support the releasePortlet() operation.

New text: Any Producer that supports cloning portlets on performBlockingInteraction() or performInteraction() invocations MUST support the releasePortlet() operation.

Reasoning: Why wouldn't this be a MUST?