atom feed216 messages in org.apache.wicket.usersRe: Free wicket from component hierar...
FromSent OnAttachments
77 earlier messages
Carl-Eric MenzelNov 9, 2010 4:12 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 4:21 am 
Vitaly TsaplinNov 9, 2010 4:29 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 4:34 am 
Matthias KellerNov 9, 2010 4:46 am 
manuelbarziNov 9, 2010 4:49 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 4:49 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 4:54 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 4:57 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 4:58 am 
manuelbarziNov 9, 2010 5:26 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 5:48 am 
Frank SilbermannNov 9, 2010 6:46 am 
Martin GrigorovNov 9, 2010 6:58 am 
Carl-Eric MenzelNov 9, 2010 7:02 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 7:05 am 
Carl-Eric MenzelNov 9, 2010 7:11 am 
Carl-Eric MenzelNov 9, 2010 7:14 am 
Frank SilbermannNov 9, 2010 7:19 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 7:20 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 7:22 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 7:26 am 
Frank SilbermannNov 9, 2010 7:28 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 7:32 am 
Wilhelmsen Tor IverNov 9, 2010 7:32 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 7:33 am 
Carl-Eric MenzelNov 9, 2010 7:36 am 
John OwenNov 9, 2010 7:36 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 7:38 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 7:45 am 
Frank SilbermannNov 9, 2010 7:48 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 7:51 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 7:57 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 8:00 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 8:04 am 
Carl-Eric MenzelNov 9, 2010 8:05 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 8:06 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 8:07 am 
Carl-Eric MenzelNov 9, 2010 8:10 am 
SebastianNov 9, 2010 8:18 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 8:26 am 
manuelbarziNov 9, 2010 8:31 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 8:33 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 8:34 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 8:36 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 8:37 am 
Carl-Eric MenzelNov 9, 2010 8:39 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 8:40 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 8:46 am 
Carl-Eric MenzelNov 9, 2010 8:46 am 
Igor VaynbergNov 9, 2010 8:47 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 8:48 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 8:49 am 
Igor VaynbergNov 9, 2010 8:49 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 8:50 am 
Frank SilbermannNov 9, 2010 8:50 am 
Igor VaynbergNov 9, 2010 8:53 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 8:55 am 
Igor VaynbergNov 9, 2010 8:55 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 8:56 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 8:57 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 8:58 am 
Igor VaynbergNov 9, 2010 8:58 am 
Igor VaynbergNov 9, 2010 8:59 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 8:59 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 9:03 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 9:05 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 9:11 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 9:13 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 9:16 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 9:22 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 9:25 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 9:29 am 
SebastianNov 9, 2010 9:29 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 9:33 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 9:33 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 9:38 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 9:38 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 9:41 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 9:42 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 9:45 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 9:51 am 
Johan CompagnerNov 9, 2010 10:00 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 10:04 am 
Johan CompagnerNov 9, 2010 10:25 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 10:29 am 
Johan CompagnerNov 9, 2010 10:36 am 
Igor VaynbergNov 9, 2010 10:52 am 
Igor VaynbergNov 9, 2010 10:53 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 10:54 am 
Johan CompagnerNov 9, 2010 10:59 am 
Igor VaynbergNov 9, 2010 11:02 am 
Igor VaynbergNov 9, 2010 11:08 am 
Johan CompagnerNov 9, 2010 11:10 am 
Michael BrinkmanNov 9, 2010 11:27 am 
Sven MeierNov 9, 2010 12:03 pm 
Igor VaynbergNov 9, 2010 12:15 pm 
Igor VaynbergNov 9, 2010 12:17 pm 
Igor VaynbergNov 9, 2010 12:22 pm 
Sven MeierNov 9, 2010 12:42 pm 
39 later messages
Subject:Re: Free wicket from component hierarchy hell
From:Carl-Eric Menzel (cmen@wicketbuch.de)
Date:Nov 9, 2010 8:46:51 am
List:org.apache.wicket.users

On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 11:33:31 -0500 James Carman <jam@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:

Say you have two forms on one panel (don't know if this is the best example or not, but here goes). You want to move a field from one panel to another. You'd have to do that in code with the traditional approach. With the "queued" approach, you'd just queue all your components to the parent container and it would auto-add them to the correct subcomponent as it finds them in the markup.

Are you moving a field from one form to another? But that does change the semantics, doesn't it? If it doesn't, why are there two forms?

With this, the order does matter, though. Suppose you had two components you wanted to queue with the same id, completely different components. If you reverse their order, then they're auto-added in a different order.

Ouch. I think this has the potential to be a showstopper. This will be an endless source of hard-to-find bugs. I think there needs to be a unique-id requirement when you start using queue.

Right now we require unique-ids on the same hierarchy level, i.e. direct descendants of the same component. With queue, we're basically extending necessity that to the whole subtree.

Carl-Eric www.wicketbuch.de