atom feed39 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-archRe: making the snoop device loadable.
FromSent OnAttachments
Alfred PerlsteinJul 9, 2000 12:04 am 
AdamJul 9, 2000 1:19 am 
Alfred PerlsteinJul 9, 2000 3:33 am 
AdamJul 9, 2000 6:25 am 
Daniel C. SobralJul 9, 2000 6:52 am 
Boris PopovJul 9, 2000 7:20 am 
AdamJul 9, 2000 10:45 am 
Poul-Henning KampJul 9, 2000 10:49 am 
Wilko BulteJul 9, 2000 10:59 am 
AdamJul 9, 2000 11:12 am 
Poul-Henning KampJul 9, 2000 11:16 am 
AdamJul 9, 2000 11:56 am 
Alfred PerlsteinJul 9, 2000 12:06 pm 
AdamJul 9, 2000 12:35 pm 
Alfred PerlsteinJul 9, 2000 1:13 pm 
AdamJul 9, 2000 1:19 pm 
John BaldwinJul 9, 2000 1:24 pm 
AdamJul 9, 2000 1:25 pm 
AdamJul 9, 2000 1:30 pm 
John BaldwinJul 9, 2000 1:34 pm 
AdamJul 9, 2000 2:56 pm 
John BaldwinJul 9, 2000 3:08 pm 
Doug BartonJul 9, 2000 4:39 pm 
Marius BendiksenJul 9, 2000 4:40 pm 
Marius BendiksenJul 9, 2000 4:45 pm 
Marius BendiksenJul 9, 2000 4:47 pm 
Marius BendiksenJul 9, 2000 4:53 pm 
Alfred PerlsteinJul 9, 2000 4:56 pm 
Jeroen C. van GelderenJul 9, 2000 5:36 pm 
Jeroen C. van GelderenJul 9, 2000 5:38 pm 
Jeroen C. van GelderenJul 9, 2000 5:44 pm 
Alfred PerlsteinJul 9, 2000 6:02 pm 
Mike SmithJul 9, 2000 8:27 pm 
Mike SmithJul 9, 2000 8:35 pm 
AdamJul 9, 2000 9:06 pm 
Dag-Erling SmorgravJul 10, 2000 12:08 am 
Peter WemmJul 10, 2000 1:01 am 
Andrzej BialeckiJul 10, 2000 3:36 am 
Bruce EvansJul 10, 2000 4:48 am 
Subject:Re: making the snoop device loadable.
From:Doug Barton (Dou@gorean.org)
Date:Jul 9, 2000 4:39:58 pm
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-arch

Alfred Perlstein wrote:

Basically, does anyone have a problem with snp becoming loadable before I commit to finishing off the work? (it's loadable now, but not unloadable).

Just a "me too" to say that I think this is a good idea. Admins who really really don't want this to be loaded should bump securelevel.

Doug

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message