atom feed37 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-archRe: Importing lukemftpd
FromSent OnAttachments
Mike HeffnerJul 16, 2001 6:24 pm 
Dima DorfmanJul 16, 2001 10:33 pm 
Dan MoschukJul 17, 2001 10:22 am 
Kris KennawayJul 17, 2001 10:35 am 
Mike HeffnerJul 17, 2001 4:01 pm 
Mike HeffnerJul 17, 2001 4:29 pm 
Greg LeheyJul 18, 2001 12:53 am 
Alfred PerlsteinJul 18, 2001 1:04 am 
Dan MoschukJul 18, 2001 11:50 am 
Dan MoschukJul 18, 2001 11:51 am 
Mike HeffnerJul 18, 2001 8:50 pm 
Kris KennawayJul 19, 2001 2:33 am 
David O'BrienJul 19, 2001 11:21 am.patch, .patch
Kris KennawayJul 19, 2001 12:29 pm 
Kris KennawayJul 19, 2001 12:30 pm 
Mike HeffnerJul 19, 2001 2:46 pm 
Mike HeffnerJul 19, 2001 3:34 pm 
David O'BrienJul 19, 2001 3:54 pm 
David O'BrienJul 19, 2001 3:57 pm 
Mike SmithJul 19, 2001 4:04 pm 
Kris KennawayJul 19, 2001 4:37 pm 
David O'BrienJul 19, 2001 8:30 pm 
David O'BrienJul 19, 2001 8:36 pm 
David O'BrienJul 19, 2001 8:39 pm 
Kris KennawayJul 19, 2001 9:03 pm 
Terry LambertJul 20, 2001 9:34 am 
Dima DorfmanJul 20, 2001 10:14 am 
David O'BrienJul 20, 2001 11:22 am 
Mike HeffnerJul 21, 2001 9:11 pm 
Assar WesterlundJul 22, 2001 2:07 pm 
Warner LoshJul 23, 2001 3:20 pm 
Assar WesterlundJul 24, 2001 1:16 pm.diff
Mike HeffnerJul 24, 2001 5:55 pm 
Assar WesterlundJul 24, 2001 6:07 pm 
Mike HeffnerJul 24, 2001 8:41 pm 
David O'BrienJul 27, 2001 10:19 am 
Kris KennawayJul 27, 2001 12:07 pm 
Subject:Re: Importing lukemftpd
From:Kris Kennaway (kr@obsecurity.org)
Date:Jul 17, 2001 10:35:43 am
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-arch

On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 09:24:54PM -0400, Mike Heffner wrote:

Hi,

I would like to import Luke Mewburn's ftpd from NetBSD as the ftpd for FreeBSD. David had originally brought up the idea of importing it back in December, but it appears that he hasn't had the time, or other issues have come up. However, I would like to bring up the discussion again as I think it's a needed improvement--NetBSD's ftpd is better maintained and has better standards compliance.

This has been discussed extensively over on -audit in the past. Basically, I have concerns as security officer about replacing an ftpd which has a good security track record with one which contains large amounts of unaudited code, and has had several security problems. The FreeBSD ftpd is used on far too many installed systems out there to risk introducing new root vulnerabilities, no matter how good the lukemftpd code is or how small that risk.

There are also problems with missing features as you note. The last time this came up I offered the compromise solution of importing it into FreeBSD to work on feature parity and to give auditors a known base to work from, but it is not to become the default ftpd until I've signed off on it. We now have funding to perform in-depth auditing work on FreeBSD, so I think this would be achieved in a reasonable timeframe (probably by 5.0-RELEASE).

Kris