12 messages in at.iem.pd-devRe: [PD-dev] Re: GCC errors building ...| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Michael A. Hobson | Nov 27, 2005 2:10 pm | |
| Tim Blechmann | Nov 27, 2005 3:20 pm | |
| Michael A. Hobson | Nov 27, 2005 4:15 pm | |
| Tim Blechmann | Nov 28, 2005 7:12 am | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | Dec 30, 2005 7:59 am | |
| c | Dec 30, 2005 11:04 am | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | Dec 30, 2005 11:39 am | |
| Thomas Grill | Jan 2, 2006 1:44 am | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | Jan 2, 2006 7:09 am | |
| Thomas Grill | Jan 2, 2006 7:15 am | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | Jan 2, 2006 7:21 am | |
| Thomas Grill | Jan 2, 2006 7:43 am |
| Subject: | Re: [PD-dev] Re: GCC errors building devel_0_39 | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Thomas Grill (gr...@grrrr.org) | |
| Date: | Jan 2, 2006 1:44:41 am | |
| List: | at.iem.pd-dev | |
Hi Matju,
GCC 3.4.3 error report: http://www.dolphin-speech.net/mike/errors-gcc343.lst GCC 4.0.0 error report: http://www.dolphin-speech.net/mike/errors-gcc400.lst I don't know of any reason why I should be getting internal compiler errors trying to build this codebase, it doesn't make sense to me at all.
can you compile anything? this looks like a compiler error ... did you try gcc 3.3?
I should've said this: just because something is a bug in the compiler doesn't mean we don't have to take it into account. Trying to compile devel_0_39 with simd=1 seems to be really, really troublesome with most versions of GCC I encounter. Most people who come to me with problems compiling devel_0_39 have that compiler error problem, so I have to tell them to do scons simd=0, except that sometimes they're trying devel_0_39 *because* of SIMD.
What kind of problems are those? They can't be related to the mentioned ones in the error reports above.
greetings, Thomas