| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | Jul 9, 2010 1:34 pm | |
| András Murányi | Jul 9, 2010 1:49 pm | |
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | Jul 9, 2010 1:54 pm | |
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | Aug 19, 2010 6:37 pm | |
| András Murányi | Aug 19, 2010 7:54 pm | |
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | Aug 20, 2010 1:37 pm | |
| András Murányi | Aug 20, 2010 2:08 pm | .pub |
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | Aug 20, 2010 2:13 pm | |
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | Aug 23, 2010 4:09 pm | |
| András Murányi | Aug 23, 2010 5:25 pm | |
| András Murányi | Aug 23, 2010 7:20 pm | |
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | Aug 23, 2010 8:40 pm | |
| András Murányi | Aug 24, 2010 4:56 pm | |
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | Aug 24, 2010 5:46 pm | |
| András Murányi | Aug 24, 2010 5:50 pm | |
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | Aug 25, 2010 8:06 am | |
| András Murányi | Aug 25, 2010 6:53 pm | |
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | Aug 26, 2010 8:46 am | |
| András Murányi | Aug 26, 2010 9:55 am | |
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | Aug 26, 2010 10:20 am | |
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | Aug 26, 2010 11:54 am | |
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | Aug 29, 2010 10:48 am | |
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | Aug 29, 2010 11:15 am | |
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | Aug 29, 2010 2:31 pm | |
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | Aug 29, 2010 2:48 pm | |
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | Sep 7, 2010 2:31 pm | |
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | Sep 7, 2010 2:33 pm | |
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | Sep 13, 2010 2:41 pm | |
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | Sep 13, 2010 3:01 pm | |
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | Sep 13, 2010 4:16 pm | |
| András Murányi | Sep 13, 2010 5:35 pm | |
| András Murányi | Sep 13, 2010 5:48 pm | |
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | Sep 13, 2010 9:00 pm | |
| András Murányi | Sep 14, 2010 1:08 pm | |
| András Murányi | Sep 14, 2010 1:32 pm | |
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | Sep 14, 2010 1:34 pm | |
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | Sep 14, 2010 1:35 pm | |
| András Murányi | Sep 14, 2010 2:08 pm | |
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | Sep 14, 2010 8:13 pm | |
| András Murányi | Sep 15, 2010 1:10 pm | |
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | Sep 15, 2010 4:11 pm | |
| András Murányi | Sep 15, 2010 5:30 pm | |
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | Sep 15, 2010 7:08 pm | |
| András Murányi | Sep 16, 2010 9:21 am | |
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | Sep 16, 2010 11:39 am | |
| András Murányi | Sep 20, 2010 12:26 pm | |
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | Sep 21, 2010 12:08 pm | |
| András Murányi | Sep 21, 2010 3:56 pm | |
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | Sep 21, 2010 10:58 pm | |
| András Murányi | Sep 22, 2010 5:12 pm |
| Subject: | Re: [PD-dev] buildbot or some other proper build automation | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Hans-Christoph Steiner (ha...@at.or.at) | |
| Date: | Sep 7, 2010 2:33:37 pm | |
| List: | at.iem.pd-dev | |
On Sep 7, 2010, at 4:54 PM, András Murányi wrote:
2010/8/29 Hans-Christoph Steiner <ha...@at.or.at> On Sun, 2010-08-29 at 22:08 +0200, András Murányi wrote:
Ok, the problem is the backport of buildbot relies on a newer version of dpkg, which could cause Pd-extended builds to be incompatible with a plain Debian/lenny machine. Once Pd-extended is released, I can upgrade without worrying about it.
I understand.
I'd like to keep the 128.238.56.50 machine as the master since the rest are more or less "disposable". So we can wait for Pd- extended to be released to upgrade (less than 2 weeks hopefully), we can work with the version that is installed now, or if you want you could install a newer version manually, then we can switch to the new Debian package once Pd-extended is released.
Sounds good. So you mean i shall install a new version somewhere under /var/lib/buildbot? Will it run ok as a daemon? Or shall i build a new version which you then install over the existing one?
Ok, I just built the package myself from source and removed the dependency on dpkg 1.15 and set it to 1.14 for lenny instead. That means 0.7.12 is now installed on debian-stable-i386.
very nice! Now we have a console view too (http://128.238.56.50:8010/console ), but i don't see if tells anything about what's happening on the different buildslaves. Maybe later we could artificially try to break things on one platform and not on the others, and see how the web views help finding the broken one. Reorganizing the builders would certainly make things less clear, so i consider it a last resort.
Also, about the slave names, would it be possible to use the same names that are on the PdLab page? I.e. not CamelCase, but with-dashes instead :)
Sure, i will. Soon :)
Now i'm at CVS polling... it goes with a script snippet, which i'm
not sure about if it does what we want... could you take a look at
http://128.238.56.50:8010/waterfall
sometimes and see if the changes trigger the right builder? The
snippet is like this:
def my_file_splitter(path): # file splitter for BRANCHNAME/PROJECT/ FILEPATH repos pieces = path.split('/') if pieces[0] == 'trunk': branch = None pieces.pop(0) # remove 'trunk' elif pieces[0] == 'branches': pieces.pop(0) # remove 'branches' # grab branch name branch = 'branches/' + pieces.pop(0) else: return None # something weird projectname = pieces.pop(0) # if projectname != 'pure-data': # return None # wrong project return (branch, '/'.join(pieces))
further explanation is here:
http://buildbot.net/buildbot/docs/latest/SVNPoller.html
About maintaining the 64-bit server... i'd pick it up, but as far as i know myself i'm a creative type with less perseverance... also i've never maintained chroot, but i guess it's not a big deal.
Andras
Actually, looking at what you have running already for Pd-extended, we want to have the whole Pd-extended sources polled:
from buildbot.changes.svnpoller import SVNPoller
c['change_source'] =
SVNPoller("http://pure-data.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/pure-data/branches/pd-extended/0.42
")
This is really cool! Thanks for getting it going!
.hc
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
The arc of history bends towards justice. - Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
_______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list Pd-...@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev






.pub