9 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-jailHierarchical jails - any current work?| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| James Gritton | Sep 18, 2007 2:27 pm | |
| Alexander Leidinger | Sep 19, 2007 5:49 am | |
| Pawel Jakub Dawidek | Sep 19, 2007 8:24 am | |
| Julian Elischer | Sep 19, 2007 12:08 pm | |
| James Gritton | Sep 19, 2007 12:30 pm | |
| Julian Elischer | Sep 19, 2007 1:08 pm | |
| James Gritton | Sep 19, 2007 1:18 pm | |
| Julian Elischer | Sep 19, 2007 1:28 pm | |
| Pawel Jakub Dawidek | Sep 19, 2007 11:24 pm |
| Subject: | Hierarchical jails - any current work? | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Julian Elischer (jul...@elischer.org) | |
| Date: | Sep 19, 2007 1:28:24 pm | |
| List: | org.freebsd.freebsd-jail | |
James Gritton wrote:
please please please familiarise yourself with the Vimage code that Marko Zec is working on.
This is the stuff at http://imunes.tel.fer.hr/virtnet/, right? I take it that's the definitive place to go. I recall having looked at that before, and I guess I was thrown off by the "net work virtualization" title and didn't know it was to be a general jail replacement. So sure, I'll give that a thorough study and see what I can do with it. I still hope I can contribute and not just have bothered you all to just end up being another user :-).
- Jamie
Network virualisation is one part of the job.. it uses jail code to provide other separation, but it would be good if the connections were more 'formal'.
We should have an official architecture for this sort of thing.
Marco has said that one of the things that needs to be done is to spend time integrating it better with the other (read jail) virtualisation code.. That could be your name I hear being called :-)