2 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.oicRE: [oic] package conformance testing...| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Hanssens Bart | Jan 15, 2009 11:59 am | |
| Dennis E. Hamilton | Jan 15, 2009 12:29 pm |
| Subject: | RE: [oic] package conformance testing, wishlist | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Dennis E. Hamilton (denn...@acm.org) | |
| Date: | Jan 15, 2009 12:29:48 pm | |
| List: | org.oasis-open.lists.oic | |
You'll get push-back from people who think that the standalone <office:document> XML document should be deprecated (although I'm not one of them).
Meanwhile, I do think it is particularly useful to identify "gaps" as well as places where test assertions can be made already (the shalls and mays).
(Considering who we are, my wishlist is for an "Interoperable ODF" or ODF-I.)
- Dennis
-----Original Message----- From: Hanssens Bart [mailto:Bart...@fedict.be] Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 12:00 http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/oic/200901/msg00028.html To: oi...@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [oic] package conformance testing, wishlist
Probably I'm stating the obvious...
It might be a good idea when we're going through the spec highlighting the "shalls" / testable items, to also keep an eye on:
- parts that can't be tested properly - a wishlist for a "basic-ODF" or a stricter spec
For example, personally, I would love to have a spec stating that ODF-readers must be able to open both packaged and non-packaged documents, that writers are required to keep all "strange" files when round-tripping etc.
Best regards,
Bart
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php