37 messages in org.apache.lucene.solr-devRe: Can we use Berkley DB java in Solr| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् | Dec 1, 2008 1:42 am | |
| Ian Holsman | Dec 1, 2008 3:05 am | |
| Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् | Dec 1, 2008 3:14 am | |
| Grant Ingersoll | Dec 1, 2008 2:21 pm | |
| Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् | Dec 1, 2008 8:20 pm | |
| Chris Hostetter | Dec 1, 2008 9:24 pm | |
| Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् | Dec 1, 2008 10:02 pm | |
| Yonik Seeley | Dec 2, 2008 6:29 am | |
| Andrzej Bialecki | Dec 2, 2008 7:11 am | |
| Yonik Seeley | Dec 2, 2008 7:45 am | |
| Jason Rutherglen | Dec 2, 2008 8:05 am | |
| Andrzej Bialecki | Dec 2, 2008 8:41 am | |
| Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् | Dec 2, 2008 8:44 am | |
| Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् | Dec 2, 2008 8:46 am | |
| Yonik Seeley | Dec 2, 2008 9:02 am | |
| Dawid Weiss | Dec 2, 2008 9:03 am | |
| Shalin Shekhar Mangar | Dec 2, 2008 9:08 am | |
| Yonik Seeley | Dec 2, 2008 9:25 am | |
| Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् | Dec 2, 2008 10:12 am | |
| Ryan McKinley | Dec 2, 2008 9:00 pm | |
| Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् | Dec 2, 2008 10:28 pm | |
| Andrzej Bialecki | Dec 3, 2008 2:59 am | |
| Grant Ingersoll | Dec 3, 2008 4:22 am | |
| Ryan McKinley | Dec 3, 2008 5:43 am | |
| Mark Miller | Dec 3, 2008 5:47 am | |
| Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् | Dec 3, 2008 7:19 am | |
| Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् | Dec 4, 2008 12:43 am | |
| Sami Siren | Dec 4, 2008 7:20 am | |
| Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् | Dec 4, 2008 7:29 am | |
| Ryan McKinley | Dec 4, 2008 8:22 am | |
| Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् | Dec 4, 2008 8:32 am | |
| Yonik Seeley | Dec 4, 2008 8:37 am | |
| Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् | Dec 4, 2008 8:47 am | |
| Yonik Seeley | Dec 4, 2008 11:26 am | |
| Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् | Dec 4, 2008 8:49 pm | |
| Yonik Seeley | Dec 5, 2008 6:16 am | |
| Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् | Dec 5, 2008 8:45 am |
| Subject: | Re: Can we use Berkley DB java in Solr | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Grant Ingersoll (gsin...@apache.org) | |
| Date: | Dec 3, 2008 4:22:07 am | |
| List: | org.apache.lucene.solr-dev | |
On Dec 3, 2008, at 1:28 AM, Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् wrote:
The code can be written against JDBC. But we need to test the DDL and data types on al the supported DBs
But , which one would we like to ship with Solr as a default option?
Why do we need a default option? Is this something that is intended to be on by default? Or, do you mean just to have one for unit tests to work?
I don't know if it is still the case, but I often find embedded dbs to be quite annoying since you often can't connect to them from other clients outside of the JVM which makes debugging harder. Of course, maybe I just don't know the tricks to do it. Derby is one DB that you can still connect to even when it is embedded.
Also, whatever is chosen needs to scale to millions of documents, and I wonder about an embedded DB doing that. I also have a hard time believing that both a DB w/ millions of docs and Solr can live on the same machine, which is presumably what an embedded DB must do. Presumably, it also needs to be able to be replicated, right?
H2 looks impressive. the jar (small) is just 667KB and the memory footprint is small too --Noble
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Ryan McKinley <ryan...@gmail.com> wrote:
check http://www.h2database.com/ in my view the best embedded DB out there.
from the maker of HSQLDB... is second round.
However, from anything solr, I would hope it would just rely on JDBC.
On Dec 2, 2008, at 12:08 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
HSQLDB has a limit of upto 8GB of data. In Solr, you might want to go beyond that without a commit.
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 10:33 PM, Dawid Weiss <dawi...@cs.put.poznan.pl>wrote:
Isn't HSQLDB an option? Its performance ranges a lot depending on the volume of data and queries, but otherwise the license looks BSDish.
http://hsqldb.org/web/hsqlLicense.html
Dawid
-- Regards, Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
-- --Noble Paul
-------------------------- Grant Ingersoll
Lucene Helpful Hints: http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/BasicsOfPerformance http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneFAQ