7 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.wsnRE: [wsn] latest draft of WS-BaseN| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Steve Graham | Dec 7, 2004 1:06 pm | |
| Murray, Bryan P. | Dec 7, 2004 3:59 pm | |
| Tom Maguire | Dec 8, 2004 6:40 am | |
| Steve Graham | Dec 8, 2004 6:56 am | |
| David Hull | Dec 8, 2004 7:33 am | |
| Steve Graham | Dec 8, 2004 1:03 pm | |
| James Bryce Clark | Dec 22, 2004 10:25 am |
| Subject: | RE: [wsn] latest draft of WS-BaseN | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Murray, Bryan P. (brya...@hp.com) | |
| Date: | Dec 7, 2004 3:59:05 pm | |
| List: | org.oasis-open.lists.wsn | |
I reviewed wsn-WS-BaseNotification-1.3-draft-01c against the latest version of the issues document. I believe the resolutions set out by the TC for all of the issues identified below have been faithfully executed in the new version of WS-BaseNotifications. I recommend that the status of these issues be changed to reflect that the resolutions have been incorporated into the document.
Bryan
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Steve Graham [mailto:sggr...@us.ibm.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 1:06 PM To: ws...@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [wsn] latest draft of WS-BaseN I posted [1] draft 01c of WS-BaseN version 1.3. This reflects consensus between David Hull and I on the resolutions to the following issues:
WSN 1,7, 2.7, 2.13, 2.14, 2.15, 2.24 and WSN2.17 revisited (Sanjay: this is an AI David Hull had, closing WSN 2.17).
We would like a third set of eyes to verify execution of these resolutions and recommend that these issues be closed. Jem, may we impose upon you again?
sgg
[1]http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsn/download.php/10478/wsn-WS-BaseNotification-1.3-draft-01c.doc ++++++++ Steve Graham (919)254-0615 (T/L 444) STSM, On Demand Architecture Member, IBM Academy of Technology <Soli Deo Gloria/> ++++++++