On Thu, 26 Apr 2012, Andrew Reilly wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 08:58:41AM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
With properly implemented hardware (i.e. drives which obey the cache
flush request) it should not be possible to corrupt zfs due to power
Does that comment apply to enerprise-class SATA drives? I was
under the impression that all SATA drives lied about cache flush
status. Hence the notion that I need to get myself a UPS.
A blanket statement like that (about SATA drives) would not be very
UPSs are quite valuable in that they help the system avoid marginal
If power is lost while a drive is currently writing, perhaps it will
move the head to the wrong position and write to the wrong place on
the disk, or perhaps the data it does write will be junk.
GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/
free...@freebsd.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "free...@freebsd.org"