| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Eran Hammer-Lahav | Jan 25, 2010 9:04 am | |
| Eran Hammer-Lahav | Jan 25, 2010 9:06 am | |
| Scott Cantor | Jan 25, 2010 9:16 am | |
| Eran Hammer-Lahav | Jan 25, 2010 9:20 am | |
| Scott Cantor | Jan 25, 2010 9:37 am | |
| Breno de Medeiros | Jan 25, 2010 9:44 am | |
| Scott Cantor | Jan 25, 2010 10:24 am | |
| Drummond Reed | Jan 26, 2010 12:08 am | |
| Scott Cantor | Jan 26, 2010 6:59 am | |
| Drummond Reed | Jan 26, 2010 7:31 am | |
| Breno de Medeiros | Jan 26, 2010 8:31 am | |
| Scott Cantor | Jan 26, 2010 8:38 am | |
| Breno de Medeiros | Jan 26, 2010 8:57 am | |
| Scott Cantor | Jan 26, 2010 9:00 am | |
| Breno de Medeiros | Jan 26, 2010 9:06 am | |
| Scott Cantor | Jan 26, 2010 9:13 am | |
| Breno de Medeiros | Jan 26, 2010 9:19 am | |
| Eran Hammer-Lahav | Jan 26, 2010 9:20 am | |
| Eran Hammer-Lahav | Jan 26, 2010 9:24 am | |
| Breno de Medeiros | Jan 26, 2010 9:29 am | |
| Scott Cantor | Jan 26, 2010 9:38 am | |
| Breno de Medeiros | Jan 26, 2010 9:42 am | |
| Scott Cantor | Jan 26, 2010 10:02 am | |
| Eran Hammer-Lahav | Jan 26, 2010 12:26 pm | |
| Eran Hammer-Lahav | Jan 26, 2010 12:32 pm | |
| Scott Cantor | Jan 26, 2010 12:44 pm | |
| Scott Cantor | Jan 26, 2010 12:46 pm | |
| Breno de Medeiros | Jan 26, 2010 1:02 pm | |
| Scott Cantor | Jan 26, 2010 1:47 pm |
| Subject: | Re: [xri] Property, rel comparison | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Breno de Medeiros (bre...@google.com) | |
| Date: | Jan 26, 2010 1:02:08 pm | |
| List: | org.oasis-open.lists.xri | |
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 12:44, Scott Cantor <cant...@osu.edu> wrote:
Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote on 2010-01-26:
I think saying that the <Subject> URI identifies a resource per 3986 is enough. That implies all the necessary processing and comparison rules. But I am happy to use another language. The point I was trying to make on the Subject URI was that it was *not* a string comparison but a URI comparison. I guess that just means scheme-specific URI comparison.
Even if 3896 isn't purely concrete about it, if we're not prepared to say more than it says, I would say we should reference it and leave it at that for <Subject>.
+ 1
But if we wanted to allow specifically for a totally application-specific set of rules for this, we really would be better off just saying *that*.
-- Scott
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
-- --Breno
+1 (650) 214-1007 desk +1 (408) 212-0135 (Grand Central) MTV-41-3 : 383-A PST (GMT-8) / PDT(GMT-7)
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php





