20 messages in org.apache.wicket.usersRe: encapsulation, extension and tran...| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Jan Kriesten | May 12, 2008 2:08 am | |
| Martijn Dashorst | May 12, 2008 4:07 am | |
| Jan Kriesten | May 12, 2008 5:28 am | |
| Martijn Dashorst | May 12, 2008 5:34 am | |
| Jan Kriesten | May 12, 2008 5:39 am | |
| Igor Vaynberg | May 12, 2008 8:25 am | |
| Johan Compagner | May 12, 2008 8:34 am | |
| Jan Kriesten | May 12, 2008 9:14 am | |
| Jan Kriesten | May 12, 2008 9:17 am | |
| Igor Vaynberg | May 12, 2008 10:12 am | |
| Jan Kriesten | May 12, 2008 10:25 am | |
| Igor Vaynberg | May 12, 2008 10:31 am | |
| Gerolf Seitz | May 12, 2008 3:00 pm | |
| Johan Compagner | May 12, 2008 3:19 pm | |
| jWeekend | May 12, 2008 4:59 pm | |
| Jonathan Locke | May 12, 2008 6:24 pm | |
| Jonathan Locke | May 12, 2008 6:36 pm | |
| Eelco Hillenius | May 12, 2008 6:51 pm | |
| Jan Kriesten | May 12, 2008 9:44 pm | |
| Jonathan Locke | May 12, 2008 10:52 pm |
| Subject: | Re: encapsulation, extension and transparent resolvers | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Igor Vaynberg (igor...@gmail.com) | |
| Date: | May 12, 2008 10:12:00 am | |
| List: | org.apache.wicket.users | |
ive seen the issue, and your comment on it:
"Jan Kriesten - 23/Apr/08 01:21 AM Just realized: Maybe it doesn't has to do anything with transparent resolvers at all but only with nested repeaters and adding cells from the innermost."
so i am a little confused as to why we are talking about transparent resolvers, and why gerolf did not apply that code himself...
personally i do not like to change code if it "maybe" helps, especially if it is markup parsing code which is a pretty fragile area in wicket.
-igor
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 9:14 AM, Jan Kriesten <jan....@renitence.de> wrote:
hi igor,
you want something done that we dont consider a priority and is not a quickie for us to fix, provide a patch.
hello? if you'd taken a look at the jira, you'd seen that there _is_ a patch. [1]
my issues are surely not high priority for you - you're not affected by them, so i can understand.
but since there _is_ a workaround which can be applied - why not doing so?
i've taken a look at the datatable, sure it's not big. the point is, i can't just replace datatable but would have to go all the way down to the AbstractDataGridView. also - all components like navigation + toolbars would have to be implemented as well...
i'm not hacking, i'm using what wicket has got. in this case wicket's 'has got' isn't working. i know about that, i can live with that - when i'm able to work around those issues. and i can't at the moment cause i can't replace MarkupFragmentFinder programatically. if i could do so i would happily replace that and all would be fine...
best regards, --- jan.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1560
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user...@wicket.apache.org