|Jan Kriesten||May 12, 2008 2:08 am|
|Martijn Dashorst||May 12, 2008 4:07 am|
|Jan Kriesten||May 12, 2008 5:28 am|
|Martijn Dashorst||May 12, 2008 5:34 am|
|Jan Kriesten||May 12, 2008 5:39 am|
|Igor Vaynberg||May 12, 2008 8:25 am|
|Johan Compagner||May 12, 2008 8:34 am|
|Jan Kriesten||May 12, 2008 9:14 am|
|Jan Kriesten||May 12, 2008 9:17 am|
|Igor Vaynberg||May 12, 2008 10:12 am|
|Jan Kriesten||May 12, 2008 10:25 am|
|Igor Vaynberg||May 12, 2008 10:31 am|
|Gerolf Seitz||May 12, 2008 3:00 pm|
|Johan Compagner||May 12, 2008 3:19 pm|
|jWeekend||May 12, 2008 4:59 pm|
|Jonathan Locke||May 12, 2008 6:24 pm|
|Jonathan Locke||May 12, 2008 6:36 pm|
|Eelco Hillenius||May 12, 2008 6:51 pm|
|Jan Kriesten||May 12, 2008 9:44 pm|
|Jonathan Locke||May 12, 2008 10:52 pm|
|Subject:||Re: encapsulation, extension and transparent resolvers|
|From:||Igor Vaynberg (igor...@gmail.com)|
|Date:||May 12, 2008 10:12:00 am|
ive seen the issue, and your comment on it:
"Jan Kriesten - 23/Apr/08 01:21 AM Just realized: Maybe it doesn't has to do anything with transparent resolvers at all but only with nested repeaters and adding cells from the innermost."
so i am a little confused as to why we are talking about transparent resolvers, and why gerolf did not apply that code himself...
personally i do not like to change code if it "maybe" helps, especially if it is markup parsing code which is a pretty fragile area in wicket.
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 9:14 AM, Jan Kriesten <jan....@renitence.de> wrote:
you want something done that we dont consider a priority and is not a quickie for us to fix, provide a patch.
hello? if you'd taken a look at the jira, you'd seen that there _is_ a patch. 
my issues are surely not high priority for you - you're not affected by them, so i can understand.
but since there _is_ a workaround which can be applied - why not doing so?
i've taken a look at the datatable, sure it's not big. the point is, i can't just replace datatable but would have to go all the way down to the AbstractDataGridView. also - all components like navigation + toolbars would have to be implemented as well...
i'm not hacking, i'm using what wicket has got. in this case wicket's 'has got' isn't working. i know about that, i can live with that - when i'm able to work around those issues. and i can't at the moment cause i can't replace MarkupFragmentFinder programatically. if i could do so i would happily replace that and all would be fine...
best regards, --- jan.