atom feed45 messages in org.apache.lucene.solr-devRE: modularization discussion
FromSent OnAttachments
Robert MuirApr 26, 2011 8:07 pm 
Yonik SeeleyApr 26, 2011 8:34 pm 
Grant IngersollApr 26, 2011 8:41 pm 
Chris MaleApr 26, 2011 9:12 pm 
Robert MuirApr 26, 2011 9:14 pm 
Michael McCandlessApr 27, 2011 3:27 am 
Michael McCandlessApr 27, 2011 3:36 am 
Mark MillerApr 27, 2011 5:12 am 
Robert MuirApr 27, 2011 5:33 am 
Steven A RoweApr 27, 2011 6:18 am 
Yonik SeeleyApr 27, 2011 6:24 am 
Steven A RoweApr 27, 2011 6:48 am 
Michael McCandlessApr 27, 2011 8:49 am 
Grant IngersollApr 27, 2011 5:50 pm 
Yonik SeeleyApr 27, 2011 6:23 pm 
Greg SteinApr 27, 2011 8:44 pm 
Grant IngersollMay 2, 2011 3:11 pm 
Ryan McKinleyMay 2, 2011 4:31 pm 
Mark MillerMay 2, 2011 7:27 pm 
Michael McCandlessMay 3, 2011 9:49 am 
Michael McCandlessMay 3, 2011 9:55 am 
Mark MillerMay 3, 2011 10:11 am 
Shai EreraMay 3, 2011 10:29 am 
Ryan McKinleyMay 3, 2011 10:31 am 
Mark MillerMay 3, 2011 10:46 am 
Michael McCandlessMay 4, 2011 5:25 am 
Mark MillerMay 4, 2011 6:10 am 
Robert MuirMay 4, 2011 6:29 am 
Uwe SchindlerMay 4, 2011 6:41 am 
Mark MillerMay 4, 2011 6:49 am 
Simon WillnauerMay 4, 2011 7:01 am 
Simon WillnauerMay 5, 2011 1:15 am 
Grant IngersollMay 5, 2011 7:25 am 
Mark MillerMay 5, 2011 7:40 am 
Simon WillnauerMay 5, 2011 8:03 am 
Grant IngersollMay 5, 2011 8:34 am 
Jason RutherglenMay 5, 2011 9:58 am 
Chris HostetterMay 6, 2011 1:35 pm 
Mark MillerMay 6, 2011 1:44 pm 
Michael McCandlessMay 7, 2011 3:30 am 
Simon WillnauerMay 7, 2011 3:34 am 
Michael McCandlessMay 7, 2011 3:45 am 
Michael McCandlessMay 7, 2011 4:01 am 
Simon WillnauerMay 7, 2011 4:10 am 
Grant IngersollMay 7, 2011 5:20 am 
Subject:RE: modularization discussion
From:Steven A Rowe (sar@syr.edu)
Date:Apr 27, 2011 6:18:52 am
List:org.apache.lucene.solr-dev

if its not stated as "this feature is going to Lucene"

It seems as though some people assume that since Lucene is a library, and Solr
is an application, that exposing Solr API *means* making it part of Lucene. It
ain't necessarily so, and it need not be a point of contention.

I want to reiterate my opinion (voiced pre-merge) that there be a third entity
here besides Solr and Lucene.

E.g., if "modules/" became "thirdentity/", with its own org.apache.thirdentity
namespace, wouldn't questions of ownership/control mostly go away?

Steve