atom feed20 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-portsRe: pgcc port
FromSent OnAttachments
Satoshi AsamiSep 24, 1996 3:30 am 
Warner LoshSep 24, 1996 7:35 am 
Andreas KlemmSep 24, 1996 6:45 pm 
Satoshi AsamiSep 25, 1996 4:09 am 
Andreas KlemmSep 25, 1996 8:37 am 
John DysonSep 25, 1996 9:15 am 
Andreas KlemmSep 25, 1996 10:46 pm 
Satoshi AsamiSep 26, 1996 2:21 am 
Andreas KlemmSep 26, 1996 4:50 am 
Jordan K. HubbardSep 26, 1996 5:55 pm 
Andreas KlemmSep 27, 1996 12:38 am 
Jordan K. HubbardSep 27, 1996 1:27 am 
Andreas KlemmSep 27, 1996 2:39 am 
Julian H. StaceySep 28, 1996 9:24 am 
Pedro GiffuniSep 28, 1996 9:22 pm 
Ollivier RobertSep 29, 1996 4:18 am 
Pedro GiffuniSep 29, 1996 11:04 am 
Mark MurraySep 29, 1996 12:05 pm 
Ollivier RobertSep 29, 1996 2:44 pm 
Pedro GiffuniSep 30, 1996 9:06 am 
Subject:Re: pgcc port
From:Andreas Klemm (andr@klemm.gtn.com)
Date:Sep 25, 1996 8:37:19 am
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-ports

On Wed, 25 Sep 1996, Satoshi Asami wrote:

* Hmm, what about people, that don't have /usr/src installed ?! They can install the package. :)

They could, but you know, that many people prefer to compile everything on their own system ... I belong to these people, too.

* I think they want still a working ports mechanism. * We shoudn't mix ports collection and /usr/src tree, or ?!

But I don't think that justifies the cost of having two copies of the source. (The gcc-2.7.2 tarball is almost 7 megs!)

Deep in my heart I think, that someone, who has the whole sources unpacked has enough resources to store such a 7MB large file as well.

But if someone is really low on diskspace, so that he doesn't install the whole sources, is perhaps happy, to have that relativ compact 2.7.2 tgz archive, even if it is 7 MB large.

* Besides that, I don't have a concrete idea, how to bring in the * pgcc patches without patching gcc in contrib ... And this is * certainly not wanted.

Make a copy of contrib/gcc under work/? :)

Shudder ;) No ;) I wouldn't vote for this. Please, let us keep things a they are.

I believe John Dyson has been using P5-optimized gcc for quite a while....

John, what do you think about integration some or all Pentium related patches into our main cc 2.7.2.1 ?!