| Subject: | Re: Anything like COM in Java? | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Jonathon McKitrick (jc...@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org) | |
| Date: | Jul 3, 2002 3:10:48 am | |
| List: | org.freebsd.freebsd-java | |
Refine Search
| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| j mckitrick | Jun 28, 2002 4:21 am | |
| Fredrick Nilsson | Jun 28, 2002 4:25 am | |
| j mckitrick | Jun 28, 2002 4:55 am | |
| Fredrick Nilsson | Jun 28, 2002 5:54 am | |
| John Utz | Jun 28, 2002 9:32 am | |
| Alexander Kabaev | Jun 28, 2002 10:03 am | |
| j mckitrick | Jun 28, 2002 10:51 am | |
| Jonathan Chen | Jun 28, 2002 3:04 pm | |
| John Utz | Jun 28, 2002 3:09 pm | |
| John Utz | Jun 28, 2002 3:33 pm | |
| Jonathon McKitrick | Jul 3, 2002 3:10 am | |
| Jonathon McKitrick | Jul 4, 2002 5:19 am | |
| Ernst de Haan | Jul 5, 2002 2:16 am |
| Subject: | Re: Anything like COM in Java? | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Jonathon McKitrick (jc...@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org) | |
| Date: | Jul 3, 2002 3:10:48 am | |
| List: | org.freebsd.freebsd-java | |
| > contract interactions. How can I do this in Java? Do Interfaces work | > well enough for this? Is there a Java binary equivalent, so the binding | > takes place at run-time rather than compile-time? | | Would a network classloader do what you want? There'd be still quite a | bit of work to do to handle the interaction.
On looking at things more closely, COM is not dynamic run-time binding. Since you still have to begin with a type library, the interfaces are all defined ahead of time, just like Java. So, it looks like the best way to do this is with Java interfaces, just like I'd planned.
jm
-- My other computer is your windows box.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majo...@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message

