19 messages in ru.sysoev.nginxRe: Is mod_php walking on its road?
FromSent OnAttachments
Steve ChuOct 23, 2007 2:01 am 
Aleksandar LazicOct 23, 2007 2:12 am 
Igor SysoevOct 23, 2007 2:15 am 
marc...@public.gmane.orgOct 23, 2007 2:24 am 
Alejandro VartabedianOct 23, 2007 2:42 am 
Manlio PerilloOct 23, 2007 2:46 am 
Igor SysoevOct 23, 2007 3:03 am 
Igor SysoevOct 23, 2007 3:05 am 
Manlio PerilloOct 23, 2007 3:27 am 
Steve ChuOct 23, 2007 3:51 am 
Alejandro VartabedianOct 23, 2007 4:03 am 
Manlio PerilloOct 23, 2007 4:05 am 
Steve ChuOct 23, 2007 7:13 pm 
Yusuf GoolamabbasOct 24, 2007 1:01 am 
Igor SysoevOct 24, 2007 3:14 am 
Steve ChuOct 24, 2007 8:22 am 
Thomas SeifertOct 24, 2007 8:50 am 
Igor SysoevOct 30, 2007 1:11 am 
Manlio PerilloOct 30, 2007 4:35 am 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:Re: Is mod_php walking on its road?Actions...
From:Alejandro Vartabedian (list@public.gmane.org)
Date:Oct 23, 2007 4:03:10 am
List:ru.sysoev.nginx

Igor Sysoev escribió:

On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 07:42:54AM -0200, Alejandro Vartabedian wrote:

Definitively mod_php isn't a good solution at all. I've used php as an apache module for a long time and now with ngnix i turned to a pure cgi solution, the benchmarks with the nginx fastcgi mode are very similar, but the server doesn't get bloated at the short time. I recommend you to forget mod_php, i think the fastcgi architecture is more flexible and scalable.

FastCGI support in PHP currently leaves much to be desired. You may try to use PHP FastCGI Process Manager http://php-fpm.anight.org/

Very interesting project, thanks.