21 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.wsbpelRe: [wsbpel] Q: guidelines for reliab...| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| LI Yanming / FTR&D / US | Sep 9, 2003 10:29 am | |
| Ron Ten-Hove | Sep 9, 2003 10:54 am | |
| Martin Chapman | Sep 9, 2003 11:22 am | |
| Ugo Corda | Sep 9, 2003 11:23 am | |
| David RR Webber - XML ebusiness | Sep 9, 2003 11:24 am | |
| Ron Ten-Hove | Sep 9, 2003 11:43 am | |
| Ugo Corda | Sep 9, 2003 11:54 am | |
| Ron Ten-Hove | Sep 9, 2003 12:13 pm | |
| Ron Ten-Hove | Sep 9, 2003 12:16 pm | |
| David RR Webber - XML ebusiness | Sep 9, 2003 1:34 pm | |
| Ron Ten-Hove | Sep 9, 2003 3:51 pm | |
| David RR Webber - XML ebusiness | Sep 9, 2003 4:23 pm | |
| Eckenfels. Bernd | Sep 10, 2003 6:49 am | |
| Ugo Corda | Sep 10, 2003 7:58 am | |
| Martin Chapman | Sep 10, 2003 11:19 am | |
| David RR Webber - XML ebusiness | Sep 10, 2003 12:03 pm | |
| Ron Ten-Hove | Sep 10, 2003 12:31 pm | |
| Eckenfels. Bernd | Sep 10, 2003 12:43 pm | |
| David RR Webber - XML ebusiness | Sep 10, 2003 7:45 pm | |
| Ron Ten-Hove | Sep 12, 2003 7:49 am | |
| David RR Webber - XML ebusiness | Sep 12, 2003 9:17 am |
| Subject: | Re: [wsbpel] Q: guidelines for reliability? | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | David RR Webber - XML ebusiness (Gnos...@compuserve.com) | |
| Date: | Sep 9, 2003 1:34:35 pm | |
| List: | org.oasis-open.lists.wsbpel | |
Ron,
EXACTLY! This problem has already been solved by the CPA team!!
Why re-invent this? The partner role stuff in BPEL is weak compared to CPA - so makes sense to upgrade here.
Using your CPA you can point at the BPEL process and specify the QoS in the CPA. I've also very successfully templated this for CPA - so that the delivery options and combinations are simply drag-and-drop options within the CPA wizard UI.
Makes sense for us to liaise with the CPA team to ensure that a CPA can define BPEL processing adequately.
Looking at it they already have the means provided to point at a BPEL script. The BPEL engine may need to query the CPA to determine lowerlevel functionality - and that we may need to ensure there are the right "slots" for within the CPA schema.
Probably an excellent exercise to go thru anyway - to quantify the details that are relevant for BPEL.
Thanks, DW. ================================================================== Message text written by Ron Ten-Hove
These could be used by the deployer when selecting or creating the appropriate bindings for the abstract operation "acceptPayment".
This still wouldn't help the interoperability problem -- two deployers for two different engines that must interoperate must "exchange notes" to assure compatible bindings are chosen. This starts to become a very CPA-like exercise.
-Ron <