37 messages in org.apache.incubator.ooo-devRe: [RELEASE]: preparation for our fi...| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Jürgen Schmidt | Feb 24, 2012 2:23 am | |
| Andrea Pescetti | Feb 24, 2012 2:53 am | |
| Jürgen Schmidt | Feb 24, 2012 3:05 am | |
| Raphael Bircher | Feb 24, 2012 3:37 am | |
| Andrea Pescetti | Feb 24, 2012 3:40 am | |
| Jürgen Schmidt | Feb 24, 2012 4:18 am | |
| Andre Fischer | Feb 24, 2012 4:26 am | |
| Jürgen Schmidt | Feb 24, 2012 4:28 am | |
| Rory O'Farrell | Feb 24, 2012 4:33 am | |
| Rory O'Farrell | Feb 24, 2012 4:36 am | |
| Jürgen Schmidt | Feb 24, 2012 4:42 am | |
| imacat | Feb 24, 2012 7:16 am | |
| Ross Gardler | Feb 24, 2012 8:03 am | |
| Rob Weir | Feb 24, 2012 4:05 pm | |
| Pedro Giffuni | Feb 24, 2012 6:24 pm | |
| Ross Gardler | Feb 25, 2012 3:06 am | |
| Ross Gardler | Feb 25, 2012 3:19 am | |
| O.Felka | Feb 25, 2012 3:26 am | |
| Ross Gardler | Feb 25, 2012 4:15 am | |
| Kay Schenk | Feb 25, 2012 8:53 am | |
| Jürgen Schmidt | Feb 26, 2012 12:52 am | |
| Jürgen Schmidt | Feb 26, 2012 1:05 am | |
| Michael Bauer | Feb 26, 2012 3:40 am | |
| Rob Weir | Feb 26, 2012 11:50 am | |
| Jürgen Schmidt | Feb 27, 2012 2:12 am | |
| Andre Fischer | Feb 27, 2012 2:30 am | |
| Michael Bauer | Feb 27, 2012 5:03 am | |
| Andre Fischer | Feb 27, 2012 6:27 am | |
| Andrea Pescetti | Feb 27, 2012 6:55 am | |
| Michael Bauer | Feb 27, 2012 7:47 am | |
| Andre Fischer | Feb 27, 2012 8:04 am | |
| Michael Bauer | Feb 27, 2012 8:43 am | |
| Kay Schenk | Feb 28, 2012 4:08 pm | |
| Andrea Pescetti | Feb 29, 2012 12:58 pm | |
| Andre Fischer | Mar 1, 2012 2:48 am | |
| Paolo Pozzan | Mar 3, 2012 11:28 am | |
| Andrea Pescetti | Mar 10, 2012 6:13 am |
| Subject: | Re: [RELEASE]: preparation for our first release | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Jürgen Schmidt (jogi...@googlemail.com) | |
| Date: | Feb 26, 2012 12:52:27 am | |
| List: | org.apache.incubator.ooo-dev | |
Am Samstag, 25. Februar 2012 schrieb O.Felka :
Am 25.02.2012 01:06, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Feb 24, 2012, at 11:05 AM, Ross Gardler<rgar...@opendirective.com> wrote:
Without commenting on the dates, schedules and technical issues I
would urge you to make sure you allow significant time for IP review from mentors and the IPMC. I imagine this release will get a great deal of attention and, almost without a doubt, someone will come up with something that needs to be addressed.
Mentors and IPMC members have had 8 months to offer IP related comments. They are welcome at any time. But in my experience declaring a Release Candidate is especially effective at concentrating their attention on that task.
We should plan on having multiple RC iterations. There are enough unwritten rules related to release requirements that we'll almost certainly need several iterations. But the most effective way to uncover these unwritten rules is by proposing a RC for a release vote.
A release by votes? Wouldn't it be better to have some concrete release criteria? Having some quality goals that must be reached?
it is not contradictory and have I pointed out that we don't release if there are valid concerns.
We will release when we don't have critical show stopper issues. And discussion on show stopper issues should take place on ooo-dev when issues marked as critical. I don't think we have to define the rules for show stopper issues again and can use the existing ones (e.g. crashes, data loss, ...)
I hope people will take it serious and don't vote against a release without valid concerns.
Juergen
Groetjes, Olaf