atom feed69 messages in com.selenic.mercurial-develRe: [PATCH 4 of 4] summary: show if p...
FromSent OnAttachments
Martin GeislerMay 7, 2010 10:33 am 
Dirkjan OchtmanMay 7, 2010 10:37 am 
Matt MackallMay 7, 2010 10:59 am 
Martin GeislerMay 7, 2010 11:14 am 
Matt MackallMay 7, 2010 11:46 am 
Dirkjan OchtmanMay 7, 2010 1:14 pm 
Gilles MorisMay 8, 2010 12:10 am 
Martin GeislerMay 8, 2010 1:31 am 
Martin GeislerMay 8, 2010 1:34 am 
Martin GeislerMay 8, 2010 1:48 am 
Martin GeislerMay 8, 2010 2:09 am 
Gilles MorisMay 8, 2010 3:50 am 
Martin GeislerMay 8, 2010 1:10 pm 
Gilles MorisMay 9, 2010 9:33 am 
Gilles MorisMay 9, 2010 1:49 pm 
Gilles MorisMay 9, 2010 1:49 pm 
Gilles MorisMay 9, 2010 1:49 pm 
Gilles MorisMay 9, 2010 1:49 pm 
Gilles MorisMay 9, 2010 1:49 pm 
Matt MackallMay 9, 2010 2:36 pm 
Matt MackallMay 9, 2010 2:43 pm 
Matt MackallMay 9, 2010 2:45 pm 
Matt MackallMay 9, 2010 2:47 pm 
Martin GeislerMay 9, 2010 4:11 pm 
Dirkjan OchtmanMay 9, 2010 10:50 pm 
Gilles MorisMay 9, 2010 11:31 pm 
Gilles MorisMay 9, 2010 11:49 pm 
Matt MackallMay 10, 2010 12:04 am 
Gilles MorisMay 10, 2010 12:37 am 
Gilles MorisMay 10, 2010 12:37 am 
Matt MackallMay 10, 2010 12:38 am 
Matt MackallMay 10, 2010 12:58 am 
Sune FoldagerMay 11, 2010 2:02 am 
Sune FoldagerMay 11, 2010 2:08 am 
Sune FoldagerMay 11, 2010 2:14 am 
Sune FoldagerMay 11, 2010 2:20 am 
Matt MackallMay 11, 2010 3:53 pm 
Matt MackallMay 11, 2010 3:56 pm 
Gilles MorisMay 12, 2010 12:52 am 
Gilles MorisMay 12, 2010 1:15 am 
Gilles MorisMay 12, 2010 1:15 am 
Gilles MorisMay 12, 2010 1:15 am 
Gilles MorisMay 12, 2010 1:15 am 
Gilles MorisMay 12, 2010 1:15 am 
Gilles MorisMay 12, 2010 5:17 am 
Augie FacklerMay 12, 2010 7:35 am 
Matt MackallMay 12, 2010 8:33 am 
Matt MackallMay 12, 2010 8:34 am 
Matt MackallMay 12, 2010 8:34 am 
Matt MackallMay 12, 2010 8:55 am 
Gilles MorisMay 12, 2010 2:33 pm 
Gilles MorisMay 13, 2010 7:31 am 
Matt MackallMay 13, 2010 1:48 pm 
Martin GeislerMay 17, 2010 1:09 am 
Martin GeislerMay 17, 2010 1:22 am 
Rafael Villar Burke (Pachi)May 17, 2010 2:07 am 
Augie FacklerMay 17, 2010 5:57 am 
Martin GeislerMay 17, 2010 6:56 am 
Augie FacklerMay 17, 2010 7:46 am 
Martin GeislerMay 17, 2010 8:13 am 
Augie FacklerMay 17, 2010 8:41 am 
Gilles MorisMay 19, 2010 8:00 am 
Martin GeislerMay 19, 2010 3:53 pm 
Martin GeislerMay 19, 2010 3:58 pm 
Augie FacklerMay 24, 2010 5:15 am 
Peter ArrenbrechtMay 26, 2010 6:23 am 
Rafael Fernández LópezJun 3, 2010 5:35 am 
Peter ArrenbrechtJun 3, 2010 6:14 am 
Martin GeislerJun 4, 2010 12:18 am 
Subject:Re: [PATCH 4 of 4] summary: show if parents are closed heads
From:Matt Mackall (mp@selenic.com)
Date:May 11, 2010 3:56:40 pm
List:com.selenic.mercurial-devel

On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 11:20 +0200, Sune Foldager wrote:

On 10-05-2010 09:59, Matt Mackall wrote:

On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 09:38 +0200, Gilles Moris wrote:

# HG changeset patch # User Gilles Moris <gill@free.fr> # Date 1273438087 -7200 # Node ID 3e17baf3a45861ee1c8e3c9f0dce46afa1570c99 # Parent 4f227e0671ba95e075ecdc2d2a6b5f3f0072e5bf summary: show if parents are closed heads

I think this ought to go on the branch: line instead.

I'm worried about that, since it will state incorrect information (or at least confusing) for people with >1 head per named branch. In that case, the branch will not be closed, but only this branch-head. It's of course hard to put "(current branch-head closed)" in a shorter sentence :-p.

Actually, now that we're planning on complaining on commit, this can go on the commit line:

commit: 2 modified, 3 unknown (head closed)

We already report "(new head)" there, so it seems a pretty good fit.