atom feed42 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.ebxml-bpRe: [ebxml-bp] State Alignment and We...
FromSent OnAttachments
Jean-Jacques DubrayJun 9, 2004 5:07 pm 
David RR WebberJun 9, 2004 6:19 pm 
Jacques DurandJun 9, 2004 8:26 pm 
Jean-Jacques DubrayJun 9, 2004 9:54 pm 
David RR WebberJun 10, 2004 7:10 am 
Jean-Jacques DubrayJun 10, 2004 8:01 am 
Yunker, JohnJun 10, 2004 8:18 am 
Jean-Jacques DubrayJun 10, 2004 11:15 am 
David RR WebberJun 10, 2004 11:21 am 
David RR WebberJun 10, 2004 11:35 am 
Monica J. MartinJun 13, 2004 9:59 pm 
Boonserm (Serm) KulvatunyouJun 16, 2004 2:44 pm 
David RR WebberJun 16, 2004 2:53 pm 
David RR WebberJun 16, 2004 2:58 pm 
Dale MobergJun 16, 2004 3:03 pm 
Boonserm (Serm) KulvatunyouJun 16, 2004 3:09 pm 
Boonserm (Serm) KulvatunyouJun 16, 2004 3:16 pm 
Monica J. MartinJun 16, 2004 4:15 pm 
David RR WebberJun 16, 2004 4:49 pm 
David RR WebberJun 16, 2004 5:20 pm 
Boonserm (Serm) KulvatunyouJun 16, 2004 8:23 pm.gif, .zip, .zip
David RR WebberJun 16, 2004 9:26 pm 
Hima...@sybase.comJun 16, 2004 11:01 pm.gif, .zip, .zip
Monica J. MartinJul 13, 2004 1:22 pm 
David RR WebberJul 13, 2004 2:17 pm 
Jean-Jacques DubrayJul 13, 2004 2:49 pm 
David RR WebberJul 13, 2004 7:12 pm 
Monica J. MartinJul 13, 2004 7:28 pm 
Dale MobergJul 13, 2004 8:07 pm 
David RR WebberJul 13, 2004 8:25 pm 
Kenji NagahashiJul 15, 2004 3:39 pm 
David RR WebberJul 15, 2004 3:59 pm 
Monica J. MartinJul 15, 2004 4:02 pm 
Monica J. MartinJul 15, 2004 4:07 pm 
David RR WebberJul 15, 2004 4:21 pm 
Monica J. MartinJul 15, 2004 4:26 pm 
Kenji NagahashiJul 16, 2004 2:20 pm 
David RR WebberJul 16, 2004 2:40 pm 
Monica J. MartinJul 21, 2004 5:48 pm 
Steve CapellNov 1, 2004 1:58 am 
Monica J. MartinNov 1, 2004 7:38 am 
Dale MobergNov 1, 2004 8:32 am 
Subject:Re: [ebxml-bp] State Alignment and Web Services
From:David RR Webber (dav@drrw.info)
Date:Jul 13, 2004 8:25:27 pm
List:org.oasis-open.lists.ebxml-bp

Monica,

I believe this came out of a scenario that Anders described - where he want to Ack the RFQ - but not confirm it until downstream suppliers had responded.

Therefore 'pending' was offered as an additional status. Anders also wanted to make sure that the signal was *not* a legally binding response - hence 'pending' again avoids that connotation.

It all made sense to me at the time - and I included this in the XML example I posted on signals - along with the additional two attributes - (BTW - signalType - agree that is not needed - and can be deferred to V3).

Thanks, DW

mm1: David, I do not recall that we defin3ed a pending status in the special sessions. Dale, can you confirm please. Thanks.