atom feed21 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-archRe: How much security should ldconfig...
FromSent OnAttachments
John PolstraJul 26, 2000 7:35 pm 
Chris CostelloJul 26, 2000 8:54 pm 
Nate WilliamsJul 26, 2000 10:54 pm 
Mark MurrayJul 26, 2000 11:15 pm 
Warner LoshJul 26, 2000 11:24 pm 
Adrian ChaddJul 27, 2000 12:03 am 
Poul-Henning KampJul 27, 2000 12:30 am 
Alfred PerlsteinJul 27, 2000 12:44 am 
Jacques A. VidrineJul 27, 2000 5:50 am 
Neil Blakey-MilnerJul 27, 2000 5:52 am 
Jacques A. VidrineJul 27, 2000 6:38 am 
Daniel O'ConnorJul 27, 2000 6:44 am 
Neil Blakey-MilnerJul 27, 2000 6:47 am 
Robert WatsonJul 27, 2000 8:14 am 
Alfred PerlsteinJul 27, 2000 9:39 am 
Jacques A. VidrineJul 27, 2000 11:03 am 
Ollivier RobertJul 27, 2000 12:32 pm 
John PolstraJul 27, 2000 9:28 pm 
John PolstraJul 27, 2000 9:38 pm 
Alexander LeidingerJul 28, 2000 5:09 am 
John PolstraJul 28, 2000 8:21 am 
Subject:Re: How much security should ldconfig enforce?
From:Nate Williams (na@yogotech.com)
Date:Jul 26, 2000 10:54:29 pm
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-arch

3. It could default to strictly secure but accept a command-line option to relax the constraints. And an rc.conf knob could be added to control whether or not it was strict at boot time.

What do you folks think about this?

I vote #3. It gives us a more secure 'default', but allows people with special configurations to tweak it for their particular 'less secure' environments.

Nate

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message