atom feed46 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-currentRe: Bruce vandalism again
FromSent OnAttachments
Julian ElischerDec 19, 1997 4:29 pm 
Greg LeheyDec 19, 1997 7:26 pm 
John-Mark GurneyDec 19, 1997 9:50 pm 
Bruce EvansDec 20, 1997 12:39 am 
John S. DysonDec 20, 1997 1:03 am 
John BirrellDec 20, 1997 1:12 am 
J WunschDec 20, 1997 2:23 am 
Bruce EvansDec 20, 1997 3:39 am 
John BirrellDec 20, 1997 4:46 am 
Nate WilliamsDec 20, 1997 6:18 am 
John S. DysonDec 20, 1997 6:34 am 
Mike SmithDec 20, 1997 8:15 am 
Mike SmithDec 20, 1997 8:20 am 
Bruce EvansDec 20, 1997 9:01 am 
Jordan K. HubbardDec 20, 1997 10:17 am 
Archie CobbsDec 20, 1997 10:26 am 
Jordan K. HubbardDec 20, 1997 10:34 am 
John S. DysonDec 20, 1997 10:42 am 
John S. DysonDec 20, 1997 10:45 am 
John S. DysonDec 20, 1997 10:49 am 
Terry LambertDec 20, 1997 11:03 am 
Jordan K. HubbardDec 20, 1997 11:13 am 
Terry LambertDec 20, 1997 11:17 am 
Terry LambertDec 20, 1997 11:20 am 
John S. DysonDec 20, 1997 11:20 am 
Jordan K. HubbardDec 20, 1997 11:29 am 
Bruce EvansDec 20, 1997 11:45 am 
Mike SmithDec 20, 1997 4:51 pm 
Mike SmithDec 20, 1997 4:54 pm 
Nate WilliamsDec 20, 1997 5:23 pm 
Greg LeheyDec 20, 1997 5:35 pm 
Greg LeheyDec 20, 1997 5:37 pm 
Greg LeheyDec 20, 1997 5:38 pm 
Brian SomersDec 20, 1997 6:55 pm 
J WunschDec 21, 1997 2:02 am 
J WunschDec 21, 1997 2:04 am 
Dmitrij TejblumDec 21, 1997 6:08 am 
Greg LeheyDec 21, 1997 3:48 pm 
Nate WilliamsDec 21, 1997 6:10 pm 
Simon ShapiroDec 22, 1997 2:59 pm 
J WunschDec 23, 1997 12:02 pm 
Terry LambertDec 26, 1997 5:03 pm 
Mikael KarpbergDec 26, 1997 6:42 pm 
John S. DysonDec 26, 1997 7:51 pm 
Tim VanderhoekDec 26, 1997 8:33 pm 
Mikael KarpbergDec 26, 1997 9:48 pm 
Subject:Re: Bruce vandalism again
From:Nate Williams (na@mt.sri.com)
Date:Dec 20, 1997 5:23:20 pm
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-current

If style(9) is broken, which apparently it is, then it should be fixed. It isn't a religious document, but one that should change with the times.

It's not broken.

So we buck the trend of the Industry? Many/most shops will blow your code away if it isn't ANSI.

Those kind of shops aren't worth dealing with. Many shops will blow your code away if it isn't COBOL either, and they are as relevant to the argument as the above shops.

(Imagine a design review: Why didn't you (another person, not you JKH) declare and instantiate your functions correctly, and default to K&R. Oh right, you are an old programmer, who grew up with K&R; well we don't do that anymore.)

So what? If that's the kind of folks who are doing the design reviews, then they have nothing to say. Those kind of shops are the same ones that brought us 'New Technology', which is a joke in the OS world.

John, I think you're making a big issue about a non-issue. The reason the code in FreeBSD is using K&R style is because it was written before ANSI. It hasn't been modified to ANSI style simply because it hasn't needed to. Tell your design reviewers that the 'old' code is still more robust/effecient and just as functional (if not more) than the 'new' ANSI code, and that changing code to have ANSI functions just to have ANSI functions is simply a waste of time.

Nate