atom feed8 messages in org.apache.ofbiz.devRe: jQuery branch
FromSent OnAttachments
Jacques Le RouxOct 13, 2010 1:39 am 
Sascha RodekampOct 13, 2010 5:30 am 
Jacques Le RouxDec 11, 2010 1:10 am 
Sascha RodekampDec 11, 2010 1:49 am 
Adam HeathDec 11, 2010 9:51 am 
Sascha RodekampDec 12, 2010 9:43 am 
Adam HeathDec 12, 2010 10:16 am 
Jacques Le RouxDec 12, 2010 10:46 am 
Subject:Re: jQuery branch
From:Sascha Rodekamp (sasc@googlemail.com)
Date:Dec 11, 2010 1:49:23 am
List:org.apache.ofbiz.dev

Yes cool Jacques ... i will do an trunk update right now ;)

Thanks for the merge.

You're right we should definitely keep the "jQuery( ... );" style and yes "jQuery.noConflict();" is obsolete now.

Cheers and have good day. Sascha

2010/12/11 Jacques Le Roux <jacq@les7arts.com>

As you know the jQuery branch has been merged to the trunk.

I suggested to use jQuery.noConflict(); and to keep using jQuery( instead of the $( shortcut

In the trunk I finally think we should continue to use "jQuery( instead of the $( shortcut" to allow custom project to use other libs but we don't need "jQuery.noConflict();" because OOTB there are no other js libs so no risks of conflicts

From: "Sascha Rodekamp" <sasc@googlemail.com>

+1 if we writing code for our (widget) framework and make our own jQuery plugins (for ofbiz) :-) it's best practice to use jQuery( ... instead of $( ...

Cheers Sascha

2010/10/13 Jacques Le Roux <jacq@les7arts.com>

Hi,

We are not yet completly ready (almost all is done, we need more testing), but I think that when we will merge the jQuery branch we should use

jQuery.noConflict();

and keep using jQuery( instead of the $( shortcut. Until we all agree about not doing so.

Because some of us are certainly using Dojo or/and Prototype in their custom projects based on trunk and it would be a nightmare otherwise.