atom feed35 messages in org.foaf-project.lists.foaf-protocolsRe: [foaf-protocols] fp:ping
FromSent OnAttachments
Story HenryApr 14, 2010 2:00 am 
Toby InksterApr 15, 2010 12:41 am 
Story HenryApr 15, 2010 2:09 am 
tyler gilliesApr 15, 2010 2:17 am 
tyler gilliesApr 15, 2010 2:19 am 
Mischa TuffieldApr 15, 2010 4:05 am 
Toby InksterApr 15, 2010 7:13 am 
Kingsley IdehenApr 15, 2010 7:20 am 
Kingsley IdehenApr 15, 2010 7:27 am 
Jiří ProcházkaApr 15, 2010 7:41 am 
Peter WilliamsApr 15, 2010 9:41 am 
Toby InksterApr 15, 2010 10:38 am 
Kingsley IdehenApr 15, 2010 11:13 am 
Story HenryApr 15, 2010 11:22 am 
Peter WilliamsApr 15, 2010 11:54 am 
Story HenryApr 15, 2010 11:55 am 
Kingsley IdehenApr 15, 2010 12:05 pm 
Toby InksterApr 16, 2010 4:28 am 
NathanApr 16, 2010 5:12 am 
Toby InksterApr 16, 2010 6:33 am 
NathanApr 16, 2010 6:44 am 
Story HenryApr 16, 2010 7:09 am 
Story HenryApr 16, 2010 7:40 am 
Toby InksterApr 16, 2010 8:58 am 
Danny AyersApr 16, 2010 9:26 am 
Story HenryApr 16, 2010 11:42 am 
Mischa TuffieldApr 16, 2010 12:10 pm 
Story HenryApr 16, 2010 12:14 pm 
Kingsley IdehenApr 16, 2010 12:29 pm 
Story HenryApr 16, 2010 12:58 pm 
NathanApr 16, 2010 1:02 pm 
Story HenryApr 16, 2010 1:16 pm 
NathanApr 16, 2010 1:33 pm 
Sebastian TrampApr 17, 2010 2:38 am 
Story HenryApr 17, 2010 5:27 am 
Subject:Re: [foaf-protocols] fp:ping
From:Toby Inkster (ma@tobyinkster.co.uk)
Date:Apr 15, 2010 7:13:07 am
List:org.foaf-project.lists.foaf-protocols

On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 10:09:46 +0100 Story Henry <henr@bblfish.net> wrote:

It seems unnecessarily complex.

It uses RPC, when a simple HTML FORM can do. Why? RPC was cool 8 years ago because it used XML! Wow! The continuation of this lead to the SOAP bubble, which seems to have vanished in the past year somehow.

You get the benefit of compatibility with the large installed base that Pingback has, and you get to reuse existing Pingback libraries and testing tools.