21 messages in com.mysql.lists.plusplusRE: v2.2 release plan| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Warren Young | 09 Jan 2007 05:39 | |
| Joel Fielder | 10 Jan 2007 08:20 | |
| Matt Dargavel | 10 Jan 2007 09:20 | |
| Matt Dargavel | 10 Jan 2007 10:12 | |
| Pedro Lamarão | 10 Jan 2007 10:52 | |
| Warren Young | 11 Jan 2007 19:15 | |
| Joel Fielder | 12 Jan 2007 01:06 | |
| Warren Young | 12 Jan 2007 02:16 | |
| Matt Dargavel | 12 Jan 2007 02:57 | |
| Warren Young | 12 Jan 2007 03:44 | |
| Pedro Lamarão | 12 Jan 2007 05:40 | |
| Warren Young | 12 Jan 2007 08:02 | |
| Jim Wallace | 12 Jan 2007 10:05 | |
| Pedro Lamarão | 12 Jan 2007 10:16 | |
| Warren Young | 12 Jan 2007 10:21 | |
| Warren Young | 12 Jan 2007 10:24 | |
| Orton, Steve | 12 Jan 2007 11:11 | |
| Jim Wallace | 12 Jan 2007 11:12 | |
| Chris Frey | 12 Jan 2007 12:33 | |
| Warren Young | 12 Jan 2007 12:38 | |
| Chris Frey | 15 Jan 2007 19:15 |
| Subject: | RE: v2.2 release plan![]() |
|---|---|
| From: | Matt Dargavel (ma...@shout-telecoms.com) |
| Date: | 01/12/2007 02:57:59 AM |
| List: | com.mysql.lists.plusplus |
To be honest I'm not sure how this all works, especially when you throw mingw in to the mix, but it seems that MS changed localtime to be thread safe in VS8 (compare http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bf12f0hc(VS.71).aspx and http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bf12f0hc(VS.80).aspx ). Which I guess means that msvcr80.dll contains the thread-safe version.
As far as I could tell by doing some searches there are two builds of mingw, one that links against crtdll and one against msvcrt. As long as it's the version that links against msvcrt and it uses version 8, then it should be fine. Otherwise, I don't think it will be thread safe.
Perhaps I've not understood this correctly though.
-----Original Message----- From: Warren Young [mailto:mysq...@etr-usa.com] Sent: 12 January 2007 10:17 To: MySQL++ Mailing List Subject: Re: v2.2 release plan
Joel Fielder wrote:
Is there a localtime_s? (I can check this myself, but won't do so immediately, so you might get to this before I do.)
Nope.
Okay, then unless I misunderstood the comments by Matt and Pedro, we should just use localtime() in the MinGW case. I've checked such a change in.
-- MySQL++ Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/plusplus To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/plusplus?unsub=matt@shout- telecoms.com




