21 messages in com.mysql.lists.plusplusRE: v2.2 release plan
FromSent OnAttachments
Warren Young09 Jan 2007 05:39 
Joel Fielder10 Jan 2007 08:20 
Matt Dargavel10 Jan 2007 09:20 
Matt Dargavel10 Jan 2007 10:12 
Pedro Lamarão10 Jan 2007 10:52 
Warren Young11 Jan 2007 19:15 
Joel Fielder12 Jan 2007 01:06 
Warren Young12 Jan 2007 02:16 
Matt Dargavel12 Jan 2007 02:57 
Warren Young12 Jan 2007 03:44 
Pedro Lamarão12 Jan 2007 05:40 
Warren Young12 Jan 2007 08:02 
Jim Wallace12 Jan 2007 10:05 
Pedro Lamarão12 Jan 2007 10:16 
Warren Young12 Jan 2007 10:21 
Warren Young12 Jan 2007 10:24 
Orton, Steve12 Jan 2007 11:11 
Jim Wallace12 Jan 2007 11:12 
Chris Frey12 Jan 2007 12:33 
Warren Young12 Jan 2007 12:38 
Chris Frey15 Jan 2007 19:15 
Subject:RE: v2.2 release plan
From:Matt Dargavel (ma@shout-telecoms.com)
Date:01/12/2007 02:57:59 AM
List:com.mysql.lists.plusplus

To be honest I'm not sure how this all works, especially when you throw mingw in to the mix, but it seems that MS changed localtime to be thread safe in VS8 (compare http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bf12f0hc(VS.71).aspx and http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bf12f0hc(VS.80).aspx ). Which I guess means that msvcr80.dll contains the thread-safe version.

As far as I could tell by doing some searches there are two builds of mingw, one that links against crtdll and one against msvcrt. As long as it's the version that links against msvcrt and it uses version 8, then it should be fine. Otherwise, I don't think it will be thread safe.

Perhaps I've not understood this correctly though.

-----Original Message----- From: Warren Young [mailto:mysq@etr-usa.com] Sent: 12 January 2007 10:17 To: MySQL++ Mailing List Subject: Re: v2.2 release plan

Joel Fielder wrote:

Is there a localtime_s? (I can check this myself, but won't do so immediately, so you might get to this before I do.)

Nope.

Okay, then unless I misunderstood the comments by Matt and Pedro, we should just use localtime() in the MinGW case. I've checked such a change in.