| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Rory Walsh | Feb 5, 2009 9:46 am | .pd |
| IOhannes m zmoelnig | Feb 5, 2009 9:51 am | |
| IOhannes m zmoelnig | Feb 6, 2009 1:51 am | |
| Chris McCormick | Feb 6, 2009 5:13 am | |
| Georg Werner | Feb 6, 2009 2:07 pm | |
| Claude Heiland-Allen | Feb 6, 2009 4:04 pm | |
| Georg Werner | Feb 6, 2009 5:28 pm | |
| Frank Barknecht | Feb 7, 2009 3:31 am | |
| Georg Werner | Feb 8, 2009 6:13 am | |
| Frank Barknecht | Feb 9, 2009 12:47 am | |
| zmoe...@iem.at | Feb 9, 2009 3:18 am | |
| Georg Werner | Feb 9, 2009 4:33 am | |
| zmoe...@iem.at | Feb 9, 2009 5:30 am | |
| Matt Barber | Feb 9, 2009 12:00 pm | |
| Jonathan Wilkes | Feb 9, 2009 1:45 pm | |
| Jonathan Wilkes | Feb 9, 2009 2:17 pm | |
| Mike McGonagle | Feb 9, 2009 2:43 pm | |
| Phil Stone | Feb 9, 2009 3:50 pm | |
| Georg Werner | Feb 9, 2009 3:52 pm | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | Feb 9, 2009 10:57 pm | |
| Frank Barknecht | Feb 10, 2009 2:02 am | |
| zmoe...@iem.at | Feb 10, 2009 3:50 am | |
| Phil Stone | Feb 10, 2009 7:29 am | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | Feb 10, 2009 8:37 am | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | Feb 10, 2009 8:45 am | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | Feb 10, 2009 8:56 am | |
| Frank Barknecht | Feb 10, 2009 8:59 am | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | Feb 10, 2009 9:05 am | |
| Jack | Feb 10, 2009 9:18 am | |
| Chris McCormick | Feb 10, 2009 9:20 am | |
| Phil Stone | Feb 10, 2009 9:30 am | |
| Matt Barber | Feb 10, 2009 9:36 am | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | Feb 10, 2009 9:50 am | |
| IOhannes m zmölnig | Feb 10, 2009 10:22 am |
| Subject: | Re: [PD] here I go again..dynamic abstractions | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Georg Werner (geo...@fricklr.de) | |
| Date: | Feb 8, 2009 6:13:45 am | |
| List: | at.iem.pd-list | |
Hi,
i mean message boxes. i think there is the misunderstanding. you dont send $1 as a message, too. not as message nor creation argument. its an expanded string inside an object or when it leaves a messagebox. georg
IOhannes m zmoelnig schrieb:
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 11:08:05PM +0100, Georg Werner wrote:
hi,
can somebody explain why there is a "3rd rule of $-expansion: 'there is no $0 in message-boxes'". i stumble every now and then about it and it is IMHO not self-explanatory. it is not hard to implement and wouldn't make problems with existing patches - because $0 is never used in messages. and would make things easier not only for beginners.
please explain what "$0 in messages" would mean to you. (note that i say "message" not "message-box" here).
if a message is just a context-free .. message, then it cannot have a notion of
$0.
a message-box is just a way to write down a message.
mga.sdr IOhannes
just my 2 cents.
_______________________________________________
Pd-l...@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list






.pd