11 messages in ru.sysoev.nginxRe: [ANN] Enhanced Gentoo ebuilds for...
FromSent OnAttachments
Adrian PerezMay 13, 2008 5:10 pm 
Kingsley ForemanMay 13, 2008 5:42 pm 
Manlio PerilloMay 14, 2008 12:50 am 
Phillip B OldhamMay 14, 2008 1:01 am 
Igor SysoevMay 14, 2008 1:05 am 
Manlio PerilloMay 14, 2008 1:12 am 
Grzegorz NosekMay 14, 2008 1:14 am 
Manlio PerilloMay 14, 2008 1:31 am 
Manlio PerilloMay 14, 2008 1:39 am 
Grzegorz NosekMay 14, 2008 1:47 am 
Adrian PerezMay 14, 2008 3:25 am 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:Re: [ANN] Enhanced Gentoo ebuilds for nginx 0.6.31Actions...
From:Phillip B Oldham (phil@public.gmane.org)
Date:May 14, 2008 1:01:51 am
List:ru.sysoev.nginx

I'm interested! The more back-end connectivity for nginx, the better!

Can you elaborate on why it is non orthodox?

Manlio Perillo wrote:

Adrian Perez ha scritto:

Nginx 0.6.31 ebuild for use with Gentoo and derivate distributions is now available at the "connectical-contrib" overlay [1], with the following improvements over the official Gentoo packaging:

- USE=python enables building Manlio's WSGI module [2]. - USE=scgi enables building Manlio's SCGI module (use with care!) - USE=addition enables building the bundled "addition" module - USE=perftools enables building the bundled Google perftools module - USE=gzip-static enables building the bundled precompression module

The following patched are applied when building:

- Escaping of non-printable characters in log files [4]. - Use "X-Forwarded-Host" instead of "Host" when proxying requests [5] - Fix stack overflow because of recursive calls [6]

Comments are welcome. Enjoy!

A few notes about my modules: 1) The WSGI module is not a "first class" module for Nginx. Usually you *don't* want the WSGI module inside you primary web server. 2) The SCGI module is not yet usable, since all the SCGI applications return the output response in the "parsed headers" format, and this is not yet recognized by the module (instead, it expect the output to be a full HTTP 1.x response).

By the way, if someone is interested I'm starting to write a CGI module (and, of course, in a very non orthodox way)!

Thanks for you work

--

*Phillip B Oldham* The Activity People phill-ABPfyfql6ydQOjYTieCOMbyq0pUa53/3@public.gmane.org
<mailto:phill-ABPfyfql6ydQOjYTieCOMbyq0pUa53/3@public.gmane.org>

------------------------------------------------------------------------

*Policies*

This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the above named recipient(s) only and may be confidential. If they have come to you in error, please reply to this e-mail and highlight the error. No action should be taken regarding content, nor must you copy or show them to anyone.

This e-mail has been created in the knowledge that Internet e-mail is not a 100% secure communications medium, and we have taken steps to ensure that this e-mail and attachments are free from any virus. We must advise that in keeping with good computing practice the recipient should ensure they are completely virus free, and that you understand and observe the lack of security when e-mailing us.

begin:vcard fn:Phillip Oldham n:Oldham;Phillip org:The Activity People;Systems Development email;internet:phill-ABPfyfql6ydQOjYTieCOMbyq0pUa53/3@public.gmane.org title:Chief Programmer tel;work:0870 162 4847 x-mozilla-html:TRUE url:http://theactivitypeople.co.uk/ version:2.1 end:vcard