18 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.emergencyRe: [emergency] CAP 1.1 Standard and ...| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Elysa Jones | Apr 26, 2007 7:12 am |  .doc, .doc |
| Rex Brooks | Apr 26, 2007 8:21 am | |
| Elysa Jones | Apr 26, 2007 9:07 am | |
| Elysa Jones | Apr 26, 2007 9:18 am | |
| Alessandro Triglia | Apr 26, 2007 1:34 pm | |
| Elysa Jones | Apr 26, 2007 1:48 pm | |
| Alessandro Triglia | Apr 26, 2007 2:55 pm | |
| Alessandro Triglia | Apr 26, 2007 8:33 pm | |
| Art Botterell | Apr 26, 2007 11:29 pm | |
| Olivier DUBUISSON | Apr 27, 2007 12:05 am | |
| Olivier DUBUISSON | Apr 27, 2007 12:06 am | |
| Rex Brooks | Apr 27, 2007 6:20 am | |
| Elysa Jones | Apr 27, 2007 6:27 am | |
| Art Botterell | Apr 27, 2007 7:10 am | |
| Rex Brooks | Apr 27, 2007 8:10 am | .doc |
| Renato Iannella | Apr 29, 2007 6:05 pm | |
| Rex Brooks | Apr 30, 2007 9:52 am | |
| Elysa Jones | Apr 30, 2007 10:31 am |
| Subject: | Re: [emergency] CAP 1.1 Standard and ITU-T Recommendation | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Elysa Jones (ejo...@warningsystems.com) | |
| Date: | Apr 30, 2007 10:31:38 am | |
| List: | org.oasis-open.lists.emergency | |
I will be putting a complete note out to the list soon on our summary/status on the three tasks. We will plan to review the status on our call tomorrow. I am hopeful to have this complete now in time to submit to ITU by May 10. Thanks, Elysa
At 11:51 AM 4/30/2007, Rex Brooks wrote:
Hi Elysa,
Do we have an update on where things stand?
Cheers, Rex
At 8:27 AM -0500 4/27/07, Elysa Jones wrote:
Agreed, I'll ask the OASIS Staff about any guidance along these lines. Thanks, Elysa
At 08:20 AM 4/27/2007, Rex Brooks wrote:
Makes good sense to me.
Regards, Rex
At 11:29 PM -0700 4/26/07, Art Botterell wrote:
Friends -
Sounds like a lot of important details are being picked up here, so may I offer a more general suggestion? Is there someplace where it is, or could be, stated explicitly that our overriding intent is for the ASN.1 and XML codings to represent the same data structure interchangeably?
That might seem trivial or obvious, but there's always the possibility that some small inconsistency will slip past our collective inspection, however thorough. Might it be prudent, therefore, to memorialize our overall intent as an added safeguard against some accidental artifact being mistaken for intentional at some point in the future?
- Art
-- Rex Brooks President, CEO Starbourne Communications Design GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison Berkeley, CA 94702 Tel: 510-849-2309
-- Rex Brooks President, CEO Starbourne Communications Design GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison Berkeley, CA 94702 Tel: 510-849-2309